Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
Can anyone tell me what phonological features are being used these days to distinguish clicks from regular stops? As I recall, SPE just treated them as velarized stops, and a common thing these days is to consider a dental click to have both [Coronal] and [Dorsal] articulator nodes. The fact that there's low oral pressure in the click seems to be viewed as a phonetic fact more than a phonological one by many phonologists. But that has a potential problem with the bilabial click, since the labiovelar stop [kp] is also just [Labial,Dorsal]. If any language has both [kp] and a bilabial click, some additional feature is needed. (Are there languages with both? If not, I guess it's not a problem.) (If there are languages with both, what are people using to distinguish them?) And if some phonologists are using some special features to characterize clicks in general, what are they? Thanks, from a non-africanist - -Joe Stemberger University of MinnesotaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
At least one etymological dictionary (Partridge's Origins) says that GLAMOUR is based on GRAMMAR. Can I trust it/him? And if so, what about that `L' - why R > L? Incidentally, Partridge says the following: "Glamo(u)r" was vogue'd [sic] by Scott for `magic, a magical charm': on the basis of "grammar" in the sense usually attached to obsolete "gram(m)arye": `magic, occult science', powers often, in medieval times, attributed to the learned. I very much hope the etymology IS right (otherwise I've been misleading generations of students ...), but I'd love to be able to explain the L when eyebrows go up. Prof Richard Hudson Tel: +44 171 387 7050 ext 3152 E-mail: r.hudsonMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueling.ucl.ac.uk Dept. of Phonetics and Linguistics Tel: +44 171 380 7172 Fax: +44 171 383 4108 UCL Gower Street London WC1E 6BT UK
For five years, I tutored (acting as in-loco-English-speaking-parentis) a young (now 14) Japanese girl. For several months before she went back to Japan earlier this year, we talked a lot about linguistics. She is very interested in this as a possible future career direction, so I promised her I would look for a book about linguistics that was at her level. (At this point, she would need English, not Japanese.) No one I have thus far asked about this seems to know of a textbook on linguistics that would be appropriate for teenagers/high school. If anyone has a suggestion, I would appreciate it. Karen Stanley e: karenhsMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueunivscvm.csd.scarolina.edu
I am working on a non-linear signal processing technique which might have application in the field of auditory perception. I would like to locate sources of information and/or experimental data in the area of acoustic/auditory phonetics. My own background is in mathematical physics and I would be grateful for any help received. I will of course post a summary to the list of there is any interest. Thanks in advance! Pat(rick Crehan) - -------------------------------------------------- Patrick Crehan Dept. of Mathematical Physics University College Dublin - ---------------------------------------------------Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue