Editor for this issue: <>
I am interested in finding out what's available by way of concordance programs running on the Macintosh. I have two older apps, Free Text v1.02 and one simply called Concordance v1.70 beta. The latter crashes on my LC630, the former was not adequate to the task invisioned, and unfortunately my mailing address to its developer, Mark Zimmermann, is bounced back, not being able to find its host. Could anyone help here? Guenter Plum Department of Linguistics School of English, Linguistics and Media Macquarie University North Ryde NSW 2109 AUSTRALIA Ph: 61-2-850 8740 Fax: 61-2-850 8240 Email: gplumMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueextro.ucc.su.oz.au
Dear all, We are working on a project for improving the Chinese writing ability of undergraduates and graduates on the subjects of science and technology. To help them in preparing their theses, dissertations, journal publications, reports, and term papers, we plan to edit a brochure for their guidance. This brochure will include the suggestions of the topical choice, organization, form, structure, expression, etc. of their writing subjects. In particular, we will try to point out the common mistakes in phrases and sentences which make the scientific or technological articles illogical, unclear, obscure, vague, uncertain, ambiguous, or incompact. We would appreciate for any advice, suggestions, comments and questions on this issue. Please send messages at ccyMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecc.ee.ntu.edu.tw and fmhsu
ccms.ntu.edu.tw. Thanks. C. C. Yang, Professor Fang-min Hsu, Associate Professorjorh Department of Electrical Engineering Department of Chinese Literature National Taiwan University National Taiwan University Taipei (phone)886-2-3635251 ext. 445 (fax) 886-2-3638247
I am collecting references to works which seek to show lack of relationship between/among two or more languages in various ways. I am particularly interested in arguments of the explicit form: X is true of all languages known to be related, X is not true of a particular set of languages S, therefore S is not a family of languages. There are numerous examples of such arguments that claim, for example--and quite incorrectly--that all related languages have cognate numerals 2-5, that some set of languages hypothesized to be related do not have such cognate numerals, hence they are (supposedly) unrelated. I would appreciate any references to discussions of this topic that anybody can come up with. I will post a summary. Alexis MRMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
We would very much appreciate it if you would include the following message in the LINGUIST. From-Alan Bailin, Associate Editor, Computers and the Humanities Subject-Referees for Computers and the Humanities The journal Computers and the Humanities (CHum) is looking for scholars interested in evaluating articles discussing computer applications of morphological theory. Interested parties should email a short note and a curriculum vitae to me at (abailinMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueuwo.ca). Established in 1966, Computers and the Humanities publishes articles on computer-related research and applications in the humanities and humanistically-oriented social sciences, including linguistics, and language and literary studies. All articles appearing in the journal are peer reviewed and frequently subject to substantial revision prior to publication. Alan Bailin (abailin
uwo.ca) The University of Western Ontario