Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
Surely the point is simply that the English kinship terms in -er are all of IE vintage, that we do not KNOW anything for sure about the internal analysis of IE etyma like *pMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuete:r (
=schwa) or *pHte:r (H=laryngeal) and that anything that is said on the subject is pure speculation, and that the OED is not a reliable authority on etymology (although we hope that new edition now being prepared will be). (On a side note, it appears that the recent work of the Danish Indo-Europeanists Olsen and Rasmussen may offer a way of deciding between the schwa and the laryngeal in the 'father' word, in favor of the schwa, as I understand it. Thus, at least we would be in a position to reject SOME of the speculations.)