Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
r.hudsonMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuelinguistics.ucl.ac.uk (Richard Hudson) wrote, citing Jeff Weber: >Apparently >Catholics are invited every year to "renounce the glamour of evil", which at >least confirms that GLAMOUR used to have a much more negative meaning. Not really, since the wording goes back only to c. 1970. Older forms of the baptismal promise, which we renew at Easter every year, had us rejecting "Satan and all his works and pomps". So this is simply GLAMOUR in its normal meaning: glitzy attractiveness. And some of us find evil pretty attractive. Leo A. Connolly Foreign Languages & Literatures connolly
msuvx1.memphis.edu University of Memphis