Editor for this issue: Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin
emunix.emich.edu>
I am responding to the SUMMARY on the above subject on LINGUIST List: Vol-6-1221. Fri Sep 8 1995. ISSN: 1068-4875, which was passed on to me as the author of the reconstruction of Middle Chinese in question, illustrated by the four syllables: kan kjan kian kjian The first point that needs to be made is that the second term should read: kjaan, that is, with a long vowel. Nuclei in the language in question were either short, as in the case of kan, kMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuen, (where
stands for schwa), kin, kun, kyn (where y has its IPA value as a front-rounded vowel), or long, as in the case of kjaan, kwaan, sraan (retroflex s!), and also of syllables containing the VV diphthongs -ia-, -ua-, -ya-, the first elements of which were syllabic vowels, not glides. Such diphthongs are found, for example, in Vietnamese. They are also found in r-dropping dialects of English that treat words like 'dear, beard, cure, etc' as monosyllables. It is claimed that in Middle Chinese the glide j- could occur distinctively before the vowel -i both when it was a nuclear vowel and when it was the first element in a VV diphthong, but this should not be surprising to speakers of English who distinguish the words 'ear' and 'year'. The only difference is that English does not allow initial clusters of Cj- before [i]. So there are not three different types of palatal on-glide, only one. For Vietnamese parallels I recommend the excellent account by the late and much regretted British phonetician, Eugenie Henderson, 'Towards a prosodic statement of Vietnamese syllable structure' in In Memory of J. R. Firth, edited by C. E. Bazell, et al., London: Longman's (1966). Edwin (Ted) Pulleyblank