Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
For Jakobson's view that Einstein's relativity theory was influenced by Winteler, the Swiss dialectologist, it is worthwhile to read M. Kohrt, Phonetik, Phonologie und die 'Relativitaet der Verhaeltnisse'. Zur Stellung Jost Wintelers in der Geschichte der Wissenschaft (Zeitschrift fuer Dialektologie und Linguistik, Beihefte 470), Steiner, Stuttgart, 1984, esp. 66 ff. It is all very doubtful. Anna Morpurgo DaviesMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
As a physicist who sometimes sees bits of the Linguist List, courtesy of his wife, I was surprised to hear that "Einstein ... acknowledged [Winteler] as a primary source for some of his own insights." Perhaps he did do this, but I am inclined to suppose that some offhand and generous comment by Einstein has been exaggerated by a Winteler-booster. The reason for this suspicion is that the basic notion that "things can be relative" was not one of Einstein's insights. It has been present in physics since Galileo; Einstein's contributions were some much more specific ideas. The Special Theory _of_ Relativity was a novel theory _about_ a familiar phenomenon. It said that some things long thought absolute, like time, were relative; but that other things long thought relative, like the speed of light, were absolute. Winteler's work may well have been original and profound. But I would like to warn against the temptation, offered by the perhaps misleading titles of Einstein's theories, to construe relativism, plain and simple, as the fount of modern physics. Associates of Einstein with relativistic ideas in other fields are thus not thereby likely to have had any significant influence on his physics. James Anglin Change will soon be replaced anglinMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuet6-serv.lanl.gov by something new.