Editor for this issue: Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin
emunix.emich.edu>
Dear linguists, on Thu 01 June 1995, we posted a query on ideal reference grammars (Subject: 6.754, Survey: Reference grammars) on LINGUIST List. First of all, we have to apologize that it took us quite a long time to evaluate all answers we received but we got eighty-two replies and the last one was sent to us on 01 October. This summary has the following structure: 1) Acknowledgements 2) The Original Query 3) Long Version of the Summary 4) Short Summary - ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Acknowledgements We want to thank warmly once again all those people who responded to our query. We have thanked everbody individually and we hope that we have forgotten no one. You have done us a great favor indeed. A listing of the names and email addresses of all respondents is given in the long version of this summary (s. 3). - ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2) The Original Query Our original query can be accessed at the following URL http://www.cip.fak14.uni-muenchen.de/~avg/working_papers/query.html - ------------------------------------------------------------------- 3) Long Version of the Summary The following summary is a short version. A more detailed compilation is available at the URL http://www.cip.fak14.uni-muenchen.de/~avg/working_papers/summary.html Linguists who don't have www access may contact us. We will send them the long version via email. - ------------------------------------------------------------------- 4) Short Summary 4.1 Quantity Most respondents expected a good reference grammar to contain a grammar and a lexicon. The most often named subsystems which should be described are morphology and syntax. Examples and text corpus are the most important kinds of data that should be found in a good reference grammar. Furthermore, the most often expected sort of further information is the description of language varieties. 4.2 Quality The vast majority of respondents expect a good reference grammar to be descriptive and to provide both synchronical and diachronical, but primarily synchronical information. According to the answers we received a reference grammar should not be bound to a specific linguistic theory. Forms and functions should be described together. The terminology used should be in the first place suitable for the language described. 4.3 Organisation of the Grammar The preferred order of the subsytems of a grammar is: Phonetics/Phonology - Orthography - Morphology - Syntax - Semantics - Pragmatics. >From the simple cases to the complex ones is the most wanted additional ordering principle that should be observed in a reference grammar. Most respondents expect to find a table of contents and the grammar to be organized in chapters. 4.4 Ergonomy The most often chosen ergonomical means of a grammar are tables and paradigms. The preferred media are books. 4.5 Importance of Parameters The most important aspects of a reference grammar are quality and quantity. The three most important questions in our query are: o Which subsystems of the language do you expect to be described in a good reference grammar? (1.2) o What kind of data do you expect to find in a good reference grammar? (1.3) o What do you expect about the theoretical background of a good reference grammar? (2.3) 4.6 Examples The most often cited reference grammar is Quirk et al. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of English. 4.7 Personal Information 28 respondents have field work experience. The preferred theoretical frameworks are generative ones (GB, LFG, HPSG). Most respondents use DOS and Windows computers. - ------------------------------------------------------------------- Best wishes -Roman. AVG 2.0 avgMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecip.fak14.uni-muenchen.de http://www.cip.fak14.uni-muenchen.de/~avg/ Institut fuer Deutsche Philologie Universitaet Muenchen Schellingstr. 3 D-80799 Muenchen Germany