Editor for this issue: <lveselin
emunix.emich.edu>
I have found a number of indications in the literature on 'developmental' (i.e. child/inherited) dyslexia that the reading disability of many dyslexics is due (partly?) to an inability to segment words into phonemes. This same literature suggests that children first acquire the ability to segment the speech stream into words, then words into syllables, and finally into phonemes. However, references to this acquisition sequence are vague and are presented without evidence, and I am left wondering whether illiterate adults generally do acquire the ability to segment words into phonemes, or whether this ability only comes with learning to read. A colleague who has been involved in adult literacy in a third world country tells me that, even in languages with phonemic orthographies, reading is often taught syllable-by-syllable, not phoneme-by-phoneme I would be very grateful to anyone who can provide me with references to literature on the sequence of acquisition of segmentation abilities (or the absence thereof) and will of course summarise them for the list. In view of recent discussion of the use of the list, I should add that I have also looked fairly carefully at the literature on first language acquisition, and it has not helped me to understand this topic. This literature deals with phoneme _discrimination_ in the context of minimal pairs and the like, but not with _segmentation_. Malcolm Ross Linguistics Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies Australian National University Canberra, Australia 0200 e-mail: Malcolm.RossMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueanu.edu.au
Does anyone in the list happen to know where the Spanish in the US Conference is or was this year and where the next one is scheduled to take place? Due to scheduling conflicts and lack of funds, I have been unable to parti- cipate in the last few conferences and would like to find out the dates and locations of future meetings. Thanks for your asisstance, Prof. Ana Roca Florida International University Miami, FLMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I was wondering if anyone can point me to any references on how GB theory handles conjunctions and disjunctions. As we all know, conjunctions and disjuntions can be used cross-categorially, i.e., we can produces phrases such as VP and VP NP and NP PP and PP AP and AP, etc. In addition, I am interested in finding out any references on how GB treats adjectives and adjectival phrases. Thanks a lot! Jugal Kalita PS: I would be grateful if someone knows of a mailing list or bulletin board for people who are interested in GB theory and lets me know.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I have two queries: (1) I am interested in learning about and acquiring Mac software that is useful to field linguists, for inputting data, organizing and retrieving it, etc. Any leads would be appreciated. (2) Does anyone know if the table of contents of the Yearbook of Morphology can be perused via the Web? Thanks -- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Johanna Rubba Assistant Professor, Linguistics = English Department, California Polytechnic State University = San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 = Tel. (805)-756-0117 E-mail: jrubbaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueoboe.aix.calpoly.edu = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =