Editor for this issue: Annemarie Valdez <avaldez
emunix.emich.edu>
as modifiers, APs and PPs apparently have quite a different status, as revealed by the study of nominal syntax: a) APs are somehow privileged or "inner" vs PPs; b) PPs are somehow "outside" with respect to DET, assuming a DP; etc. my question: the facts I'm dealing with, especially in Welsh nominal syntax, would be explained if the following were a canonical structure (for a two member nominal chain): DP / \ D' PP / \ D NP / \ N' NP / \ | \ N' AP N' AP | | N N can anyone see something wrong with this structure, or some odd consequences/predictions I haven't anticipated? it ensures that while the PP is necessarily last in linear order, it unambiguously modifies the head of the nominal chain (or does it?). is there empiricial disconfirmation from other languages for PP as sister D' vs N' ?? does anyone have a suggestion, assuming this is a viable structure, for why APs differ radically from PPs in this respect? e.g., something around features +/-N ?? I would hate the stipulation. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Vincent DeCaen decaenMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueepas.utoronto.ca
Dear all, a few days ago, the list newjourn announced the www-page of De Proverbio and the www-page of Do Madeira. As I have erraneously trashed them, I would be really thankful, if somebody who kept the URLs could send them along to me. Greetings Elisabeth Burr Dr. phil. Elisabeth Burr FB3/Romanistik Gerhard-Mercator Universitaet-GH Lotharstrasse 65 47048 Duisburg Tel.: +49 203 3792605 Fax.: +49 203 3792612 e-mail: he229buMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueuni-duisburg.de
In order to develop a utility for CHILDES (Child Language Data Exchange System) Brian MacWhinney and I are looking for a machine readable pronunciation dictionary of English. The utility would generate a phonetic transcription of an orthographic model, in order to create a %mod tier for analysis of child phonology. What is required is simply an ASCII word list, with phonetic transcriptions. The dictionary would have to be in the public domain, or else we would need the permission of the copyright owners to adapt the dictionary for this purpose. Any suggestions about where we might be able to track down such a dictionary would be welcome. Thanks, Joe Pater e-mail: paterjvMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuequcdn.queensu.ca