Editor for this issue: Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin
emunix.emich.edu>
>Unusual sound change. I don't know. But is t > h an example? In (Mississippi Valley) Siouan *th appears as th (or affricate variants thereof) in Dhegiha, as unaspirated t (or affricate variants thereof) in Winnebago and Chiwere, and as h in Dakotan. For example, Omaha-Ponca thi, Winnebago jii, Dakotan hi, all roots (usually occurring with additional material attached) meaning 'to arrive there'. Allan Taylor (IJAL 1976) noticed this one set and reconstructed *rh for the initial, but other Siouanists (primarily Robert Rankin and myself recently, but also the late James Owen Dorsey) have noticed a number of additional sets and detected analogies with *ph and *kh that make it clear that we're dealing here with *th (as opposed to *ht and *t and *r and *R). To complete the parallel with Wald's pattern, there are sporadic instances of *ph to h in Omaha-Ponca and Quapaw (Dhegiha), Winnebago, and Chiwere. Note that *ph/*th/*kh are quite rare compared with *hp/*ht/*hk and *p/*t/*k, so it's difficult with *ph to know if *ph to h or *ph to ph is more regular in the languages in question. The mechanics of the process of *Ch to h in Siouan are not clear. There are instances of regular shift of *p (not *ph or *hp) to w (in Winnebago and Chiwere), and it is possible, but not at all certain, that *W and *R (not *w and *r) originated in PMV as lenitions of *p and *t (not *ph and *th). A more likely scenario than lenition in the Siouan context seems to be *Ch to *CH, where H is some sort of back voiceless fricative, with subsequent reduction of *CH to *H and merger of *H and *h. By way of a parallel, Teton in Dakotan and Osage and Kansa in Dhegiha have velarization of the aspiration in aspirates (and in Osage this velar aspiration is palatalized before i and e). John E. Koontz NIST:CAML:DCISD 888.02 Boulder, CO john.koontzMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuenist.gov
RE: Unusual Sound Change t > h In Seneca, a Northern Iroquoian language of upstate New York, there is an apparent change of t > h / _n . Actually, it is the result of epenthesis followed by deletion: 0 > h / t_n (among other clusters) t > 0 / _h So, it's not really the t turning into an h. For example, the first person inclusive agent prefixes in the four Inner Iroquoian languages are: 1INdual 1INplural Seneca -hni- -twa- Onondaga -tni- -twa- Oneida -tni- -twa- Mohawk -teni- -tewa- (The e in the Mohawk forms is also epenthetic.) -Pat Crowe, SUNY at BuffaloMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue