Editor for this issue: <>
Dear Linguists, A system of articles is an innovative feature of a number of languages. Are there any examples of languages that have lost their articles? I would also be interested in creoles, especially, say, if both (all) source languages had articles, but the pidgin/creole turned out lacking them. Please respond to: oysteinMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuerhi.hi.is, in real life: 0ystein Alexander Vangsnes
I used to carry on a regular correspondence with Yoshihiro Masuya, in Kobe in Japan. Unfortunately, when I left my Utrecht home-base for a sabbatical at MIT, I didn't take his address with me. Masuya didn't use to be on e-mail, and i have looked at the public domain sources in vain, so he probably still isn't. Does anyone have Masuya's snail-mail address? Or better still, any news about him and his family after the earthquake? Please reply to me, not to the list. Thanks. fritsMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I would like the help of LINGUIST readers in finding examples of function words that have as part of their meaning an unusually specific component. I vaguely remember a case of a language having "honorific" pronouns that mean something like "you shit". Or a language whose prepositional system incorporates reference to the river that speakers of the language live next to. In general of course, we find that function morphemes are "semantically bleached" and do not have comparatively rich meanings. Please reply to fintelMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuemit.edu and I will post a summary. ---------------------------------- Kai von Fintel (fintel
mit.edu) Dept. of Linguistics & Philosophy MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139
)From my very cursory look into similarities in English and German, I have found that Old High German and Old English/Saxon independantly went through some very similar changes, such as umlauting and vowel shifts. To my knowlege, neither Old High German nor Old Saxon had umulating and they developed it independantly. Furthermore, they both independantly made very similar vowel shifts (/i/ -) /ai/, /u/ -> /au/, /e/ -> /i/, etc.). What structural similarities or instabilities did Old High German and Old Saxon share that caused the independant introduction of these features?Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue