Editor for this issue: Anthony M. Aristar <aristar
tam2000.tamu.edu>
The extraordinarily high fee which the XVIth International Congress of Linguists seems to me to be just a symbol of a rather sad fact: the ICL has never really lived up to its potential, and is out of touch with the body of linguists. If it weren't, it would never even consider such a (to most linguists) impossible fee. Most linguists have no dealings at all with it; many are even unaware of its existence. In fact, it seems to me that there is only one genuinely international, widely recognized organization in linguistics: LINGUIST itself. It's hard to find anyone in linguistics who hasn't heard of it, and most linguists use it, in one way or another, even if only to find out what jobs are available. So here's a (serious) suggestion: if we really want an international conference in linguistics, let's organize one around LINGUIST. "The 1st International LINGUIST Conference" doesn't have a bad ring; and think of seeing all the e-mail personalities we know so well in the flesh. My guess is that it would work wonderfully; and we could make sure that it would be an awful lot cheaper than the ICL...Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Can anyone recall what the registration fees etc. for recent previous International Congresses of Linguists were? That would be the most relevant datum. For comparison, if I recall correctly, the reg. fee for the International Congress of Asian and North African Studies (formerly International Congress of Orientalists) in Toronto in 1990 was either $75 or $90 US. The two Congresses are of comparable size, I think? Also, isn't it the case that for most profgessional meetings, the scholar's (and so much more so the business person's) institution pays the fees from a specified budget? So the price is relevant only to those of us who are without instututional affiliation? Perhaps organizers should establish a bargain rate for us who can't afford to go to conferences? (Cf. the subscription policy of Current Anthroplogy, which charges/d much less to subscribers in the "Third World" but doesn't offer a discount to us in that situation in the "First World".)Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Dear Colleagues, I agree entirely with Martin Haspelmath concerning the absurdely high fees for the International Congress of Linguists in Paris/77. Hildo CoutoMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue