Editor for this issue: <>
Summary of my query of early January: )Dear all, ) )I study certain discourse level aspects of human-computer interaction. A )parallel that recently has occurred to me is studying human-human )interaction over noisy channels -- which components of the dialog are )sacrificed earlier than others, and which ones are retained until the )channel deteriorates too far to be useful at all. ) )I prefer not to try to elaborate on what I mean by 'component', 'channel', )and 'noisy'. I hope someone has thought more about these things than I )have. ) )Do you know of studies or other material on this sort of thing? ) )J Thanks to all who responded: Jane A. Edwards, Alla B. Eskina, John Gilbert, D.A. Good, Dan Melamed, Kripa Sundar, Karen Ward Several responses recommended works in information theory: "For information theory approach to communication, the following is a classic and influential work, published in 3 editions from 1957-1980: Cherry, Colin. On human communication: a review, a survey, and a criticism. [Cambridge] Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology [1957]. Series title: Studies in communication." and the newer: Cover & Thomas, _Elements of information theory_, 1990. Additionally: "A book by D.Rutter entitled "Looking and Seeing" examines what happens as you progressively restrict the number of cues available to participants in any form of dialogue." And I was suggested air traffic control as a domain: "ATC is, of course, a safety-critical activity carried out over variable, noisy radio channels. You may find indirect evidence in considering the FAA-approved terminology, which was designed to miminize confusability over noisy channels." and while I have not had time to look further into the area, it seems like a good idea. Several responses noted the similarity between noise and other restrictions on modality of commmunication, such as communciation -- like this -- over a computer channel. hope these are of any use. J Jussi Karlgren, fil. lic. Jussi.KarlgrenMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuesics.se Sw Inst of Comp Sc (SICS) Spr}kteknologi / Natural Language Processing Box 1263, 164 28 Kista ph +46 8 752 15 00, fax +46 8 751 72 30 Stockholm, Sweden http://sics.se/~jussi/jussi-karlgren.html
Kulbrandstad) A week ago I posted a query on the existence of lists or newgroups dealing with the didactics of linguistics for primary and secondary schools.Dick Hudson, University College London (uclyrahMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueucl.ac.uk), and Bert Peeters, University of Tasmania (Bert.Peeters
modlang.utas.edu.au), have brought two lists to my attention: one based in Australia (Engling) and another in the UK (Edling). For the time being there seems to be very low activity on both of them, so new subscribers and contributors are welcomed.Subscriptions are made this way: For Engling send the one-line command "subscribe Engling" to mailserv
unimelb.edu.au. For Edling send "subcribe Edling" to majordomo
education.leeds.ac.uk. Three more persons have given me valuable information on the topic in question.Pirjo Karvonen from Finland (karvonen
domlang.fi) tells about an ongoing discussion on pedagogic grammar in her country. It was set off last year by the publication of a book written by professor Hakulinen and other Finnish scholars and researchers.I am sure Pirjo on demand will furnish more details.Joyce Tang Boyland from Berkeley (jtang
cogsci.Berkeley.EDU) writes that Walt Wolfram organized a symposium at NWAV23 (?) this past October about linguistics in primary and secondary schools. Joyce encourages me to try and get in e-touch with Walt Walfram on wolfram
unity.ncsu.edu.(which I have done, but without success so far).Ingo Plag from Marburg (plag
Mailer.Uni-Marburg.DE) mentions an article in the Bromberger- festschrift THE VIEW FROM BUILDING 20, edited by Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, MIT Press, 1993, about an experiment using linguistics as a subject in high schools as an introduction to science. Before closing I take the opportunity to air the following idea: a net-based comparative research project on "knowledge about language" in the school systems of different countries (contents, progression, methods, justifications etc.). Let me know if this sounds interesting to you. Lars Anders Kulbrandstad Department of Teacher Education Hedmark College N-2300 HAMAR, NORWAY Tel: +47 62 52 20 40 Fax: +47 62 52 86 40 E-mail: lak
hamarlh.no