Editor for this issue: <>
In Middle Egyptian, there is a unique contrast. There is a particle iw that most naturally is analyzed as an overt complementizer. We obtain the following contrast: sdm.f "when/if/because/etc he hears" iw sdm.f "he hears" sdm.n.f "when/if/because/etc he heard" iw sdm.n.f "he heard" Notice that the markedness relations appear backward: iw apparently marking the unmarked simple declarative. Q: are there other systems that employ an overt declarative contrasting with zero (zero having marked semantic effects)? And crucially, what is the etymology of such a particle??Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I am tentatively investigating a set of construction closely related to conditional sentences -- what I call "proportional constructions:" Like father, like son. Sw. Saadan herre, saadan hund. Turk. daha... daha... Fr. tel pere, tel fils and so on. My criteria, so far, is that they lack a verb (without loss of grammaticality) and exhibit symmetry on four levels: morphological (same inflection) syntactic (same word-order) lexical (same lexical categories) intonational (LHHL) There may be other levels of symmetry, such as conceptual (same "kinds of things"); but I don't have enough data for that. My hypothesis is that these are conditional sentences that have been shortened to iconically represent an increase in directness of connection between the protasis and the apodosis. My query, now: I have found these constructions in the following lgs: Vietnamese, Turkish, Finnish, Hungarian, Romance, and Germanic. I would like to expand this database to be able to draw more universally valid conclusions, and so I'd like to ask for examples from other lgs, especially non-Indo European ones. I am not only looking for constructions with an omitted verb, but rather all constructions that meet the symmetry criteria. I am, of course, equally interested in negative evidence. I will post a summary of my arguments when I get further along. Regards, Anders Anders Joensson Macalester College E-Mail: ljonssonMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuemacalstr.edu
Who invented the terms `pseudocleft' and 'inverted pseudocleft' (to speak for instance of sentences like "What I need is money" and "Money is what I need") ? [Note: The Oxford English Dictionary credits Jespersen (1924) for `cleft' [e.g. "It is money (that) I need"] but it does not even list `pseudocleft.']Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
In my current research on speaker identification I came across sex-specific effects in speech production: for male speakers reading isolated words or a text, there is a significant positive correlation between speech rate and body weight. This effect is completely absent for female speakers. I wonder whether there exist similar investigations or more general studies looking at correlations between body characteristics like weight, height, etc. and body functions (kinematics). Searching through the literature has been unsuccessful so far. I would be grateful for any hint or reference (possibly from other disciplines like anthropology, biology, etc.)! Wim van DommelenMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue