Editor for this issue: <>
Dear all,
I am writing a postgraduate thesis in sociolinguistics on a grammatical
aspect of the vernacular of London teenagers, namely the omission of the
verbs BE, HAVE and DO (the so-called primary verbs). The speakers whose
language is subject to study are teenagers from the London area, and most
of them tend to utter sentences like: (Omitted forms indicated in
parentheses)
(1) What you on about? (are)
(2) I seen it already. ('ve)
(3) Who she leave the baby with? (did)
(4) I got loads of homework for tomorrow. ('ve)
(1-4) are, of course, "ungrammatical" in Standard English, since a tensed
verb is required in all these sentences. I assume that sentences such as
these are subject to some process of phonological simplification, resulting
in the omission of semantically insignificant elements such as the primary
verbs. This is presumably a result of speakers' opting for rapidity rather
than grammatical "correctness" in everyday speech.
Does anyone know of any other related research going on, or of complete
studies dealing with omission of sentence elements which are semantically
insignificant? I would also appreciate any references to literature
relevant to this topic.
Any information gratefully received.
Gisle Andersen
University of Bergen
Department of English
Sydnesplass 9
N-5007 Bergen, Norway
gisle.andersen
eng.uib.no
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I heard a brief reference on the radio to a new dictionary of ASL on CD-ROM. Can anyone provide me with fuller details? -- Bernard Comrie Dept of Linguistics GFS-301 tel +1 213 740 2986 University of Southern California fax +1 213 740 9306 Los Angeles, CA 90089-1693, USA e-mail comrieMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuebcf.usc.edu
Suppose one wanted to know what the, say, 300 most frequently used verbs in British English are. How would one go about it? Is there a quicker way of finding out than putting the untagged rank list in Hofland & Johansson (1982) next to the alphabetical but tagged list in Johansson & Hofland (1989) and doing lots and lots of calculations? Dirk Noel dirk.noelMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuerug.ac.be CONTRAGRAM Dept. of English University of Gent Rozier 44 B-9000 GENT Belgium
I'd be grateful to anybody who could give me a reconstruction of the Iroquoian sound system, or any reference(s) to such a reconstructed set. Marc Picard picardMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuevax2.concordia.ca