Editor for this issue: <>
Content-Length: 1535 We are a group of environmental scientists who have been pondering a question. Has anyone done research on emotional responses to the *physical appearance* of words or groups of letters? For example, 'toxic', 'dioxin' or the 'oxi' combination. Why do people have a fear of 'dioxin' but not 'furan' (another toxic chemical). Obviously, some reaction is created by the media, but is there something else involved? Do certain combinations of letters (e.g. 'oxi') elicit an emotional response? Has anyone done research on this, or know of anyone involved with psycholinguistics or semiotics who might be familiar with this topic? Will summarize for list. Thanks for any assistance. Joyce Lundstrom Epidemiologist ETI 600 Stewart st, #700 Seattle, WA 98101 etilibMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuehalcyon.com
Content-Length: 967 I am looking for speakers of Shanghaihua who would be willing to answer a short questionnaire about the uses of Shanghaihua and Putonghua in Shanghai. Please contact me at awilliamMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuereed.edu Thanks for any assistance, Ashley Williams
I am currently reviewing literature on the subject of discontinuous constituency and would like to get my hands on work that: 1) discusses some of the larger theoretical issues at stake, and/or 2) uses the notion of discontinuous constituency to describe languages other than English (e.g., Amy Dahlstrom's article on discontinuous constituents in Fox). If anyone could point me towards some references, I would be greatly appreciative. Sincerely, Stuart Robinson Reed CollegeMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue