Editor for this issue: <>
Dear List, A couple of months ago I posted a request concerning bibliography on markedness. Now, after I have written my paper, I can present a list of referenses on markedness for those who are interested in it. BIBLIOGRAPHY Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1987). Markedness and salience in second-language acquisition. Language learning, 37 (3), 385-407. Battistella, E. L. (1990). Markedness: The evaluative superstructure of language. Albany: State University of New York Press. Benson, B. (1986). The markedness differential hypothesis: Implications for Vietnamese speakers of English. In F. R. Eckman, E. A. Moravcsik & J. R. Wirth (Eds.), Markedness (pp. 271-289). New York: Plenum Press. Birdsong, D. (1989). Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Broselow, E. (1988). Second language acquisition. In J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey. Vol. III. Language: Psychological and biological aspects. (pp. 194-209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cook, V. J. (1988). Chomsky's universal grammar: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. Croft, W. (1990). Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Eckman, F. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27 (2), 315-330. Eckman, F. (1985). The markedness differential hypothesis: Theory and applications. In Wheatley, B., Hastings, A., Eckman, F. R., Bell, L., Krukar, G. & R. Rutkovski (Eds.), Current approaches to second language acquisition. Proceedings of the 1984 University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee linguistic symposium (pp. 3-21). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistic Club. Eckman, F. (1988). Typological and parametric views on universals in second language acquisition. In S. Flynn & O'Neil, W. (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, (pp. 417-429).Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Eckman, F., Bell, L. & Nelson, D. (1988). On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 9 (1), 1-20. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Eubank, L. (1991). Introduction: Universal Grammar in the second language. In L. Eubank (Ed.), Point Counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language, (pp. 1-48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Flynn, S. and O'Neil, W. (1988). Introduction. In S. Flynn & O'Neil, W. (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 1-24). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Gair, J. W. (1988). Kinds of markedness. In S. Flynn & O'Neil, W. (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 225-250). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Gass, S. (1982). From theory to practice. In Hines, M. & Rutherford, W. (Eds.), On TESOL'81 (pp. 129-139). Washington, DC.: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Language universals: with special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton. Haegmann, L. (1991). Introduction to Government and Binding theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. Jakobson, R. and Waugh, L. R. (1987). The sound shape of language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Liceras, J. M. (1985). The role of intake in the determination of learners' competence. In S. Gass and C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Liceras, J. M. (1988a). Syntax and stylistics: more on the pro-drop parameter. In J. Pankhurst, M. Sharwood Smith & P. V. Buren (Eds.), Learnability and second languages: A book of readings (pp. 71-93). Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Liceras, J. M. (1988b). L2 learnability: Delimiting the domain of core grammar as distinct from the marked periphery. In S. Flynn & O'Neil, W. (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, (pp. 199-224). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Mazurkewich, I. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alteration by second language learners and linguistic theory. Language Learning, 34, 91-109. Mazurkewich, I. (1988). The acquisition of infinitive and gerund complements by second language learners. In S. Flynn & O'Neil, W. (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, (pp. 127-143).Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Moravcsik, E. & Wirth, J. (1986). Markedness - an overview. In F. R. Eckman, E. A. Moravcsik & J. R. Wirth (Eds.), Markedness (pp. 1-11). New York: Plenum Press. Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Social motivations for code-switching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Phinney, M. (1987). The pro-drop parameter in second language acquisition. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 221-238). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. Rutherford, W. E. (1982). Markedness in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 32 (1), 85-108. Rutherford, W. E. (1988). Grammatical theory and L2 acquisition: A brief overview. In S. Flynn & O'Neil, W. (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, (pp. 404-416).Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Safir, K. (1987). Comments on Wexler and Manzini. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 77-89). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1975). Letters and notes (pp. 162-163). The Hague: Mouton. Wexler, K. & Manzini, M. R. (1987). Parameters and learnability in Binding Theory. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter Setting (pp. 41- 76). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. White, L. (1986). Markedness and parameter setting: Some implications for a theory of adult second language acquisition. In F. R. Eckman, E. A. Moravcsik & J .R. Wirth (Eds.), Markedness (pp. 309-327). New York: Plenum Press. White, L. (1987). A note on Phinney. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 239-246). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. White, L. (1988a). Universal grammar and language transfer. In J. Pankhurst, M. Sharwood Smith & P. V. Buren (Eds.), Learnability and second languages: A book of readings (pp. 36 -60). Dordrecht: Foris Publications. White, L.(1988b). Island effects in second language acquisition. In S. Flynn & O'Neil, W. (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, (pp. 144-172).Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. White, L. (1992). Universal grammar: Is it just a new name for old problems? In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (217-232). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Wolfe Quintero, K. (1992). Learnability and the acquisition of extraction in relative clauses and wh-questions. SSLA, 14, 39-70. Zobl, H. (1983). Markedness and the projection problem. Language Learning, 33 (3), 293-313. Zobl, H. (1988). Configurationality and the subset principle: the acquisition of V1 by Japanese learners of English. In J. Pankhurst, M. Sharwood Smith & P. V. Buren (Eds.), Learnability and second languages: A book of readings (pp. 116-131). Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Zobl, H. (1994). Markedness aspects of case-marking in L1 French - L2 English Interlanguage. Unpublished manuscript. I also would like to express my gratitude to all my correspondents. Many thanks to linguistMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuetamsun.tamu.edu Jane Edwards (edwards
cogsci.berkeley.edu) Mihoko Kubota kubota
stc.ipa.go.jp Eva Mendieta-Lombardo emendiet
iunhaw1.iun.indiana.edu Natasha Artemeva (nartemev
ccs.carleton.ca)