Editor for this issue: <>
Content-Length: 1141 In my introductory semantics class we've been talking about semantic and grammatical models speakers use to create new idioms. A student came up with an amusing one a friend of hers presumably created on his own: "three french fries short of a happy meal" --also "a sandwich short of a picnic". Does anyone know if these have currency, or can they be more or less considered unique creations? Shirley SilverMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Content-Length: 1341 Dear Linguists , I would be grateful for advise on the best database package for handling complex , mostly morphological , variables . I am working on a dialect of Irish Gaelic where , for example , words can have from 10 to 20 plr allomorphs with various implicational relationships . Basically I need firstly to order the data and find the obvious patterns and later to do component analysis and multivariate analysis . I know nobody in Ireland with such experience . Would VARBRUL have a simple form from the bottom up to allow easy tabulation and simple stats ? Thank you for helpMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Content-Length: 540 Does anybody know of a conference on Applied Linguistics and/or TESL that takes place anywhere in New England between 5/31 and 6/9/95? I'm asking for someone teaching ESL overseas who has a conference allowance, & is going to his daughter's wedding 6/4 in Vermont and would like to attend a conference while he's there if possible. Any help much appreciated. Please reply directly to me as I imagine this is not of general interest (though if I'm wrong, tell me, & I'll post the info). Thanks, Nancy Novak (nenMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueu.washington.edu)
Content-Length: 2677 I am currently working on my dissertation on the development of ergativity in Indo-Aryan from a presumably passive construction and have run into a problem which I don't find answered anywhere in the literature. Maybe someone out there in internet-land could help me. There are two unmarked constructions in Middle Indo-Aryan (in this case, Pali) which could be considered ergative: the periphrastic perfect and the gerundival construction. The case of the periphrastic perfect seems to be the most straight-forward: in languages with split-ergativity, there is often a split along the lines of aspect, with the perfect requiring A in the ergative and O in the absolutive. In Pali, the verb agrees in the perfect in gender and number with O while A appears in the instrumental. In the present tense, the language is clearly of the nominative-accusative type, with a finite verb agreeing with A, which appears in the nominative and O in the accusative. However, with the gerundive, denoting obligation, the verb-form also agrees with O while here as well A appears in the instrumental. My question is this: are there any other cases of languages with this kind of a split between nominative-accusative and ergative-absolutive morphology? All I am aware of are the most common types: based on aspect (with the ergative appearing in the perfect), animacy hierarchy (or whatever you want to call it), with the ergative appearing on the lower end of the hierarchy, and the semantics of the verb, with fluid-S marking, etc., but nowhere have I been able to find a similar case to that mentioned here. It seems strange to refer to it as 'ergative', for this reason, and I've only ever seen it refered to as such once, but it does seem to fulfill the usual requirements, no matter whose definition of ergativity I use. I'd appreciate it if anyone can guide me to literature on the subject and I'd be glad to post a summary. JohnMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue