Editor for this issue: <>
I may have missed some of the discussion on this matter when I was away for a couple of weeks, but I want to throw in one item if it hasn't been in already. In English at least the phonetic distinction between a palatoalveolar afffricate and an alveolar stop + palatoalveolar fricative is patent and unproblematic. In pairs like catch it vs. cat shit ratchet vs. rat shit it is easy to hear the difference, even if the prosodic patterns are the same. In the first (let's call it /C^/ case, the stop segment is not alveolar but palatoalveolar, and short, and the whole two-quality sequence is about the length of an initial voiceless stop; in the second, let's call it /tS/ cluster, the /t/ is more alveolar, a bit retracted but without as much laminal contact, and the length of the sequence is like the length of a cluster, i.e. the stop onset is not 'ovbershort', as it is in the first case. I wonder if the distinction in German is more or less the same? Roger Lass University of Cape TOwnMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue