Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <dizdar
tam2000.tamu.edu>
I recently asked where it was that Chomsky said that in unclear cases we should let the theory choose the right analysis. The answer, supplied by Jan Odijk, Barbara Abbott, and Michael Israel (to all of whom my thanks) turns out to be Syntactic Structures, p. 14: ...in order to set the aims of grammar significantly it is sufficient to assume a partial knowledge of sentences and non-sentences. That is, we may assume for this discussion that certain sequences of phonemes are definitely sentences, and that certain others sequences are definitely non-sentences. In many intermediate cases we shall be prepared to let the grammar itself decide, when the grammar is set up in the simplest way so that it includes the clear sentences and excludes the clear non-sentences. ...A certain number of clear cases, then will provide us with a criterion of adequacy for any particular grammar.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue