Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <dizdar
tam2000.tamu.edu>
>Date: Mon, 01 Jul 1996 21:28:29 CDT >From: pdanielsMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuepress-gopher.uchicago.edu (Peter Daniels) >Subject: Re: 7.959, Qs: Scripts > >Regarding David Solnit's query about Southeast Asian scripts, I would >immodestly state that the basic reference work is now *The World's Writing >Systems*, edited by me and William Bright (Oxford UP, 1996), wherein you >will find some rather nice charts and quite full bibliography on the ancestry >of South and Southeast Asian scripts. I believe that none of our authors use >so vague a term as "Pali scripts"; "Pali" is sort of a catch-all term for >"everything post- >Sanskrit and pre-modern, particularly if it relates to Buddhism," as far as >I can tell as a non-Indicist. Re the term Pali: Pali is not a "catch-all term for everything post-Sanskrit and pre-modern". Ancient Indic languages after Vedic Sanskrit - the oldest stage - are divided into Sanskrit, Pali, Prakrit (which is really a group of languages younger than Pali), Apabhramsha (the last stage of Ancient Indic before the modern Neo-Aryan Languages emerge). Pali, Prakrit and Apabhramsha are also referred to as MIA or Middle Indo-Aryan languages. Please not that Dravidian languages are not included here! Best regards, Lars Martin Fosse Dr. art. Lars Martin Fosse Haugerudveien 76, Leil. 114, N-0674 OSLO Norway Tel: +47 22 32 12 19 Fax: +47 22 32 12 19 E-mail: L.M.Fosse
internet.no