Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
E-LEX is a new email list for the discussion of the design of dictionaries with electronic interfaces. Topics may include: * the possibilities of hypertext/hypermedia for the electronic interface * adaptation of machine-readable dictionaries to user-friendly human-usable form * issues in conversion and adaptation of paper dictionaries to electronic form The list's new homepage is at http://www.ling.nwu.edu/~sburke/e-lex/ To subscribe to E-LEX, send a message to listprocMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuelistserv.acns.nwu.edu, containing this line in the message body: subscribe E-LEX Your Name The list-owner of E-LEX is Sean M. Burke, sburke
babel.ling.nwu.edu
It will interest some members of this group to learn that there is now a lexicon of 1,119 Sumerian logograms upon my web site. The address is: http://www.primenet.com/~seagoat/sumerian/sumerian.htm The first page of the lexicon indicates the scholarly sources which I used to compile it over the twelve years of its development. The range of meanings given for each logogram tries to be as broad as the information available from all these sources. One of this lexicon's limitations is that it does not include any Sumerian words which consist of more than one logogram. Compiling a lexicon of these words would be a future project for myself or for another Internet scholar. The raison d'etre of the lexicon has also given it an idiosyncratic organization. It is organized primarily by the phonetic structure of the words, and secondarily in alphabetical order based on the word-final consonants and then vowels. The reason is because this makes it easier to see cognate words and to analyze the evolution of the Sumerian vocabulary in diachronic stages. I take a very analytical approach to the Sumerian vocabulary. It is possible to break up, analyze, and explain the evolution of many Sumerian words. Good Sumerian etymologies are given for many of the more complex logograms. My 12-page article, The Proto-Sumerian Language Invention Process, accompanies the lexicon. Here I describe how the vocabulary of the proto-Sumerians can be isolated from words invented later in time. The words with the simplest phonetic structures correspond to the earliest, most basic phenomena and concepts. By dividing Sumerian up into diachronic stages of development on the basis of phonetic structure, it is possible to conduct linguistic archaeology, deducing from the vocabulary what cultural artifacts were present at each stage of its development. One of the discoveries which this lexicon made possible is that of the proto-Sumerians' dependence on mouth-gestures for the symbolism of their consonants. I reconstruct this symbolism in detail. I also conclude that the system of tokens were already in use at a very early stage in the development of proto-Sumerian. There are some indications as to when and where the inventors of proto-Sumerian lived. I conclude that they lived at the start of the Near Eastern Neolithic, probably in villages like Ganj Dareh in the mountain passes of western Iran. Regards, John HalloranMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue