Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
My guess is that the FBI intended that the caller could not be positively identified as female or black,and that the voice characteristics mirrored the typical common-denominator features of (American) white male speech. While it is true that some African Americans do not speak AAVE or can code shift out of it, an AAVE speaker can likely be positively identified by several characteristics in most cases. The danger here as I see it is in the phrase "in most cases": There are some dialects of the South (e.g., in New Orleans) in which it would be very difficult to distinguish a white male from an African American male. If the voice print the FBI uses is computer-analysed, however, (as I assume it is), it may be the case that other acoustic features (such as voice timbre, etc.) are scrutinized in order to further distinguish the speech varieties. To what extent such acoustic features can positively identify race, I am not certain. Charlie Rowe roweMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueemail.unc.edu