Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <dizdar
tam2000.tamu.edu>
A while back, I asked whether the predicate nominals in (1) and (2) could properly be classified as either generic or specific, since (it seemed to me) they were not actually referring arguments: (1) The beagle is my favorite breed of dog. (2) Spop is my favorite dog. I further wondered about subject versus predicate in (3)and (4): (3) My favorite breed of dog is the beagle. (4) My favorite dog is Spop. I received some wonderfully thought-provoking responses from Lorie Heggie Bruce Despain Richard DeArmond Markus Hiller Andrea Moro Ewald Lang Lorie Heggie discusses issues of these sorts in great detail in her dissertation and in her WCCFL 7 and 8papers. She points out that English may treat normally referring NPs as predicates as in "Hi, I'm Lorie", and that copular sentenses create a situation where an element which behaves syntactically like a predicate may still be interpreted as referring. Thus reference would not necessarily be ruled out for the predicate nominals in (1) and (2). Suggestions from Bruce Despain, Richard DeArmond, and Markus Hiller led me to see that in (3) and (4), the *syntactic* subject is the *logical* predicate , and the *logical* argument is the *syntactic* predicate. This inversion phenomenon is well illustrated by (5) and its follow-ups: (5) The tallest man in the room is me. I am over six feet tall. * He is over six feet tall. The use of _is_ rather than _am_ shows that _the tallest man in the room_ is the syntactic subject in (5). However, the follow-ups indicate that _me_ is the only logical argument! Andrea Moro also recommends the following references: Moro, A. (1991) "The Raising of Predicates: ..." in MITWPL 15. Moro, A. (1995) "Topics in Small Clauses with Predicative Nominals" in Small Clauses, Cardinaletti, A. -Guasti, M.T. (eds.) Academic Press NY Moro, A. (in press) The Raising of Predicates: ... Cambridge Studies in Lings, CUP Thanks everyone. Debbie Schmidt Oops! Somehow I missed naming Ewald Lang among the respondents to my recent query about predicate nominals. The formulation of sentences like the following, which show that *syntactic* subjects may be *logical* predicates, and vice versa, is due to Ewald Lang's suggestion: The tallest man in the room is me. I am over six feet tall. * He is over six feet tall. Thank you, Ewald, for really getting me thinking. Debbie SchmidtMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue