Editor for this issue: Annemarie Valdez <avaldez
emunix.emich.edu>
A year or so ago it was noted on LINGUIST that the army uses the term "linguist" for job classifications involving interrogation, translation, voice intercept, etc., i.e. jobs involving knowledge of another language, but not necessarily involving any other background in the field of Linguistics. I thought you might be interested in the poster that recently appeared around our university, advertising the fact that the Naval Reserve Unit in our area currently has openings for persons who speak Bulgarian, Burmese, Cambodian, Kurdish, etc. etc. The large bold heading on this poster reads: LINGUISTICS NEEDED Although this is most likely a typo, it would be interesting if the word "linguistic" had actually developed the meaning "a person who speaks a language well" in military circles. You know: "He's a really good linguistic." and "You'd better be careful with your grammar. There's a roomful of linguistics in there." So although I'm sure most of you agree that Linguistics is/are needed, I will leave it to my fellow linguistics to figure out all the ramifications. Dilworth ParkinsonMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Is Japanese hiragana spelling phonemic? The test case would be potential minimal pairs like kuu 'sky' - kuu 'eat' where uu in the first case usually is considered to be a long u but a sequence u+u in the second, a difference marked in some versions of standard Western transliterations but not in hiragana. Of course, mora pitch is not marked in hiragana either, so the spelling is somewhat defective at any rate, but at least kuu 'eat' is HL and kuu 'sky' is either HL or LH according to my dictionary, so there should be a chance to have a real minimal pair here (the existence of which I doubt, though). Hartmut HaberlandMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Sorry to bother everybody, but does anyone know how to get a hold of the editors of the same; their email address appears to have changed and I can't seem to locate the new one. Alexis MRMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue