Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <dizdar
tam2000.tamu.edu>
Regarding "sitting on a fence", as far as I've always understood it, it indicated an "inability to make a choice or decision". In my part of the United States (and probably in the rest, as well), culturally speaking, this would be a negative quality. Meg Gam ESL Teacher "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." Gandhi *********************************************************************** The ESL/EFL/ESOL Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) file is available at: WWW: http://math.unr.edu/linguistics/mele.faq.html Usenet: misc.education.language.english ***********************************************************************Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Of course the 'Chomskyan framework' is incompatible with grammaticalization. Grammaticalization is generally conceptualized as a two-stage process. (Let uas call the stages e.g. 'reanalysis' and 'extension'.) Reanalysis is based on a pre-existent model, i.e. it is an analogical process. Extension analogically generalizes the result of reanalysis to new contexts, i.e. it too is an analogical process. (This will be argued more extensively elsewhere.) Now, Chomsky's fondness of analogy is known to be minimal(ist). Esa ItkonenMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue