Editor for this issue: Susan Robinson <robinson
emunix.emich.edu>
Re: A Borgesian joke? On page 103 of the _Other Inquisitions_ by J. L. Borges (1899-1986), I have found a vague reference to some work by Franz Kuhn commenting on a funny classification of animals by a Chinese encyclopedia entitled _Celestial Emporium of Benevolent Knowledge_: >> ... animals are divided into: (a) those that belong to the Emperor, (b) embalmed ones, (c) those that are trained, (d) suckling pigs, (e) mermaids, (f) fabulous ones, (g) stray dogs, (h) those that are included in this classification, (i) those that tremble as if they were mad, (j) innumerable ones, (k) those drawn with a very fine camel brush, (l) others, (m) those that have just broken a flower vase, (n) those that resemble flies from a distance. << As I have been working on a study of parts of speech classifications for a while, I can really appreciate the elaborate humor of this passage and I would like to refer to it in a future publication. However, I am unable to identify the Chinese encyclopedia (or the work by Franz Kuhn) Borges was referring to. Could you, please, help me find some lead to the original? Also, those colleagues who are interested in exchanging bibliographical data (and ideas) on categorization, on the principles of classification, as well as those with an interest in part-of-speech theory, please, contact me directly. Thanks in advance, Laszlo Ref.: BORGES, Jorge Luis 1964. Other Inquisitions. 1937-1952. tr. by Ruth L.C. Simms [Otros inquisiciones] Austin: University of Texas Press KUHN, Franz Walter (1884-1961) Privatgelehrter in Freiburg i.Br. Uebersetz.: _Jin Ping Mei_, usw. - ----------------- CSERESNYESI, Laszlo Prof. of Ling. Shikoku Gakuin University 765 Kagawa-ken, Zentsuji-shi, Bunkyo-cho 3-2-19 (JAPAN) TEL=FAX -81-877-63 5451 /POSTMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
an associate of mine is interested in offering a course in linguistics and literature for grad students in comp lit, english, and modern languages. I would appreciate hearing from anybody who has taught such a course as to what it should cover. thanksMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Dear Linguists, One of my colleagues asked me to post a query on this List about the use of adjective _short_, meaning "lack of". He wants to know, especially the prepostions following _short_ and the prepositional objects. He has fairly many sentences to ask, but please answer each acceptability if you are not bothered to do. His query is the following: - --------------------------------------------------------------------- I would like you to let me know whether the following sentences in which _short_ is used are acceptable. Please put OK, ? or * in each slot, and make further comments if any. (1) a. ( )We're _short of_ money. b. ( )We're _short on_ money. c. ( )We're _short_ money. (2) a. ( )We're _short of_ time. b. ( )We're _short on_ time. c. ( )We're _short_ time. (3) a. ( )We're _short of_ cash. b. ( )We're _short on_ cash. c. ( )We're _short_ cash. (4) a. ( )I'm _short of_ 10 dollars. b. ( )I'm _short on_ 10 dollars. c. ( )I'm _short_ 10 dollars. d. ( )I'm _short by_ 10 dollars. (5) a. ( )I'm _short of_ units. b. ( )I'm _short on_ 10 units. c. ( )I'm _short_ 10 units. d. ( )I'm _short by_ 10 units. e. ( )I'm ten units _short_. (6) a. ( )I'm _short of_ a few units. b. ( )I'm _short on_ a few units. c. ( )I'm _short_ a few units. d. ( )I'm _short by_ a few units. e. ( )I'm a few units _short_. (7) a. ( )We're _short of_ nurses. b. ( )We're _short on_ nurses. c. ( )We're _short_ nurses. (8) a. ( )We're _short of_ 1,000 nurses. b. ( )We're _short on_ 1,000 nurses. c. ( )We're _short_ 1,000 nurses. d. ( )We're _short by _ 1,000 nurses. e. ( )We're 1,000 nurses _short_. - ------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks a lot in advance. Please answer me directly. Best Wishes, Hiroaki Tanaka Associate Professor, 1-1, Minamijousanjima-cho, Tokushima, 770, Japan Faculty of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Tokushima University, Japan hiro-tMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueias.tokushima-u.ac.jp