Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <dizdar
tam2000.tamu.edu>
Regarding one item in the bibliography on "PC" language (better: non- sexist writing): "The Official Politically Correct Dictionary and Handbook" by Beard and Cerf is MOST EMPHATICALLY NOT a legitimate work of linguistics or lexicography like the other items on the list. It is a JOKE BOOK (and is shelved with "Humor" at at least one of the major bookstore chains in the US). This book was recently cited on a different list by another scholar based in Japan, so I wonder how it is being marketed there; perhaps stress is laid on the hundreds of scholarly-looking "footnotes" in the back. Many of those notes, however, are references to other jokebooks produced by right-wing "humorists" mocking the alleged phenomenon of "politically correct speech"; many of the references are to articles in right-wing magazines that also make fun of supposed "PC" speech. Many such items are in the fabricational tradition of Dinesh D'Souza, who published many tales of alleged persecutions as if they were fact; many of his anecdotes were completely made up or impossibly exaggerated. There is, indeed, a handful of references to actual usages (the one that struck me was to a psycholo- gist [it seemed to be] who proposed "femses" and "femstruation" in place of "menses" and "menstruation"). Needless to say, "PC" usages are used where they are appropriate--one doesn't see complaints about "flight attendant", does one, and if one says "stewardess", one doesn't get tossed off the plane, does one? Of course we had this discussion over the summer, and it needn't be repeated again; but "PC"-phobia mustn't become confused with the serious linguistic and lexicographic tools otherwise listed in Prof. Tanaka's summary.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue