Editor for this issue: Susan Robinson <robinson
emunix.emich.edu>
I am working on a paper on overt subject versus null subject in tensed clauses in English for a graduate course in Sociolinguistics. Research in this area is rather limited. Can anybody give me references to work done in this area or is anybody willing to share their own research on subject deletion in English? I would be most grateful. Also, does anybody know where I can get a copy of VARBUL? Is it as sophisticated at GOLDVARB? If not, can anybody tell me why not? Many thanks in advance. Please respond to me directly and I will post a summary to the list. Dawn Harvie dawnhMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuesympatico.ca
Dear Netters and Linguists, I wonder if any of you would kindly comment on the appropriateness of the definition "Text Type" as one assessment criteria to evaluate an interviewee's oral proficiency performance, promoted by ACTFL (The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages). In the ACTFL Guidelines, "text refers to the quantity and the organizational aspects of speech produced by the interviewee." (p. 3-6) Here is how the criteria listed to see an interviewee's speech product can be rated at: Superior level -- Extended discourse (organized, sequenced paragraphs) Advanced level -- Paragraphs Intermediate level-- Discrete sentences Novice level -- Individual words and phrases While I understand that, according to Richards et al., "text" can be referred to a piece of spoken or written language (taking its structure or functions into account), many of my friends pointed out that they are more comfortable referring "text" to written language than spoken/speech production. One suggested me to replace "Discourse Type" to "Text Type" since the interview speech production is the result of an act of communication. I would be most grateful for any comment, casting of your vote for either term (i.e., text type or discourse type), or even give a new term for this matter to enlighten me from you all in the field of linguistics. I would be happy to provide a summary in the end. Thanks in advance. Hsiu-huei Lin Domizio Doctoral Candidate Applied Linguistics, Columbia UniversityMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
In a number of Western Oceanic (Austronesian) languages, we find noun phrases in which something like 'the big house' is ostensibly expressed as 'the house's big(ness)'. That is, a noun phrase containing an attributive adjective has the structure of a noun phrase with a possessor, and the adjective occupies the 'slot' of the possessed noun, whilst the expected head noun occupies the slot of the possessor. I am interested in figuring out the history of these structures, and would be very grateful for information about similar structures in other languages (of any language family) or pointers to grammars describing them, as well as for references to any theoretical work which anyone has done on such noun phrases. I will summarise the responses, if any. Malcolm Ross ============= Malcolm Ross Senior Fellow Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies Australian National University PO Box 1428 CANBERRA A.C.T. Australia 2601Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue