Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <dizdar
tam2000.tamu.edu>
I would like to thank Dick Hudson and Knud Lambrecht for extremely interesting contributions on the "missing" object of _watch_. However, there are some points I would like to specify. If I understood right, Knud Lambrecht said that the example (2) (You're watching TV, and someone else switches the set off) Hey, don't do that - I'm watching! was different from (3) I watched for an hour before going to bed. which was INI and "totally indefinite", but he didn't give any more specifications on (2). To me it would seem correct to suggest that (2) is a case of frame-controlled DNI (instead of indefinite, as proposed by Dick Hudson). What do you think? About Knud Lambrecht's thought that (1') ?? Hey, I'm watching it. would be odd - didn't Dick Hudson say that was precisely what the young people would say? In that case, would (1) be an instance of specific-entity DNI? What do you think? Meri Larjavaara Meri.LarjavaaraMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueHelsinki.Fi University of Helsinki
I've been waiting for someone to comment on the suggestion attributed to Ivan Derzhanski that prepositions cannot assign nominative case in natural languages. Unless I've been theory-neutered and am missing something, this is not true. E.g., in Spanish, _entre_ 'between' and _segu'n_ 'according to' govern the nominative case: entre tu' y yo 'between you and me' (cf. 'sin ti', 'sin mi'') segu'n yo 'according to me'. Jim James L. Fidelholtz e-mail: jfidelMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuesiu.cen.buap.mx A'rea de Ciencias del Lenguaje or: jfidel
cca.pue.udlap.mx Instituto de Ciencias del Lenguaje Beneme'rita Universidad Auto'noma de Puebla, Me'xico