Editor for this issue: Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin
emunix.emich.edu>
On 4 November I wrote >I am looking for references to past or on-going research on evidence >for syntactic generativity, or lack of it, among native speakers of any >language, though I have a particular interest in English. I am also >interested in correlations between education and linguistic capacity. Two respondents suggested that this query needs to be clarified, particularly the term "syntactic generativity", so I will and try and spell out in more detail the kind of information what I'm looking for. There is a long standing notion that speakers of a native language have a uniform linguistic competence, statable as a generative rule system, which allows them to them to understand, at least at a syntactic level, novel sentences in their language. My query is motivated by a number of studies which suggest that the ability to understand certain types of novel but grammatical sentence appears to be related to one's level of education, or perhaps to some other underlying factor associated with one's linguistic experience. For instance, Blumenthal (1966) * found that his native English speaker subjects would misintepret centre embedded sentences as co-ordinate structures. Stolz (1968) reports that some of his subjects could only decode centre embedded constructions in the presence of semantic constraints and feedback. Blaubergs and Braine (1974) also indicate the need for extensive training in order to get people to decode these constructions appropriately. Gleitman and Gleitman (1978) compared the ability of clerical workers and phd students to understand novel noun phrases like 'house bird glass'. Apparently, despite training and offers of financial reward, the less educated speakers persisted in interpreting the noun phrase as 'glass bird house' despite the syntax which indicates that it is the glass which is being modified. The more educated speakers, however, were able to arrive at the appropriate interpretation. Finally, Dabrowska (submitted) studied four groups of native English speakers and found correletions between educational background and the ability to process gap, tough movement and complex NP constructions. The authors of these papers report that they controlled for memory capacity, and, in any case, Gleitman and Gleitman's noun phrases are hardly taxing in that respect. Each concludes that appropriate linguistic experience, either in the form of training in an experimental context or through formal education, is a signficant factor controlling performance in the constructions studied. The suggestion is that native speakers may not have the same syntactic skills in their language. This research spans 30 years and it seems to me that there must be more written on the subject. I would appreciate any references, especially anything crosslinguistic. Thanks, Ngoni Chipere Darwin College University of Cambridge UK. * My dates may be off by a year or two.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
In the debate over the creole status of Afrikaans, it has been asserted that Afrikaans is a "creoloid," and that the transmission preceding/feeding its generation was "bent, but not broken." To which scholar(s) are these two notions attributable? Charlie RoweMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Linguist-l and Arcling subscribers, I am a linguist and anthropologist who works with demographers and epidemiologists. For reasons explained below I am presently preparing a paper entitled "Male circumcision in subequitorial African culture history". This is a request for terminologies relating to male and female circumcision from Niger-Congo/Niger-Kordofanian, Nilo-Saharan, and African Afro-Asiatic and for citation details of titles which have already dealt with this topic for those languages. There are some support staff working on this so we have attached a filter to my email and responses to the questionaire below sent with the string <"Circumcision" in African languages> will go into a particular mailbox. The typists will organise the resulting titles, data and credits. The questionaire: - ------------------------------------------ To: jeff.marckMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueanu.edu.au Subject: "Circumcision" in African languages MALE AND FEMALE CIRCUMCISION IN AFRICA TERMINOLOGIES QUESTIONAIRE Please use orthographies that will survive email transmissions. A. Citation details of suggested titles of interest: _____________________ _____________________ _____________________ B. Questionaire for individual language: 1. Language Group: Afro-Asiatic __ Nilo-Saharan __ Sudanic __ Other __ Niger-Kordofanian Bantoid __ Narrow Bantu __ Eastern __ Western __ Other __ Ubangian __ Adamawa __ Other __ 2. Language Name: ___________________________ 3. Countries in which language is spoken: ___________________ 4. Are males of this group commonly circumcised? __ Yes __ No __ Variable (expand if factors are known) __ Don't know 5. Are females of this group commonly circumcised? (Female genital mutilation in any of its forms?) __ Yes __ No __ Variable (expand if factors are known) __ Don't know 4. Terminologies a. Male circumcision: 1. Nouns and verbs having to do with: 2. Comments and insights: b. Female circumcision: 1. Nouns and verbs having to do with: 2. Comments and insights: Submitted by: Name________________________ Institution ________________ Citation information if from published data: ____________________________________ Other persons you may wish to credit: ____________________________________ I will be traveling in November and December and other staff will work on terminologies that are sent to my email address during that time. I will acknowledge receipts of questionaires individually when I return in January. The resulting paper will be submitted to an appropriate journal early next year. People submitting completed questionaires will be emailed citation details when they become available and sent reprints upon request at that time. Thank you, Jeff Marck jeff.marck
anu.edu.au - -------------------------------------------- End questionaire. Background to question: The background of this query is different in the case of the two sexes. In the instance of the males it has to do with correlations between male circumcision and reduced rates of HIV infection. In the instance of the females it has to do with long term efforts to understand and promote the subsidence of the practices concerned. On the male/HIV side we have just initiated a culture history study of speakers of narrow Bantu as rates of HIV infection are variable within that group. The lack of significant male same-sex sexual activity that the Africans have long claimed for themselves appears to be born out by the lack of male same-sex HIV epidemiology around Africa. The African epidemic is driven by heterosexual transmission and rates are apparently highest in those places with high rates of chancroid, a particularly ogreish genital ulcer disease. Afflicted males and females have large open ulcers with raw, irritated capillaries at the surface. When such people engage in mundane heterosexual sex acts, their circulatory systems come into contact and HIV transmission is more or less instantaneous. Other genital ulcer diseases may be of significance but that has not been my area of work. Elevated rates of chancroid are, in turn, highly associated with lack of male circumcision. Uncircumcised males with the same risk behaviours as circumcised males get chancroid at something like four times the rate. Thus the HIV epidemic is sustained or inhibited quite differently according to male circumcision practices. The groups with very high rates of HIV infection, taking "narrow Bantu" as a whole, are those who do not practice male circumcision and these are only certain "Eastern Bantu" speakers who have or may have a (pre)history of contacts with Sudanic speakers. The equitorial boundary between the male-circumcising groups with low rates of HIV infection is specifically the northern boundary of "narrow Bantu" from about western Uganda straight across to Cameroon. To the south of that line are "narrow Bantu" speakers who practice male circumcision and have low rates of infection. To the north of that line are "Bantoid", other Niger-Congo groups, and Sudanic speaking groups who generally do no practice male circumcision and generally have high rates of infection. The affected Eastern Bantu speakers are inland groups from the lakes south to southern Africa. The the coastal Eastern Bantu from Kenya into the south have low rates again. Coastal Eastern Bantu practice(d) male circumcision while the more heavily infected inland groups do/did not. None of the attempts at subgrouping inland Eastern Bantu map isomorphically with the areas of non-circumcision and high HIV infection. Thus we believe speakers of Proto Narrow Bantu probably practiced male circumcision and that the main HIV belt from the lakes south may be due to some areal cultural effect of Eastern Bantu speakers and their contacts with Sudanic speakers. If you're still with me, the epidemiologists are curious about this as it may be a more or less closely related group of cultures that have the high rates of infection from the lakes south. Successful interventions from one area may therefore generalise more successfully than previously imagined. Jeff Marck Linguistics-RSPAS Australian National University and ___________________________________________________________ Jeff Marck Health Transition Review (HTR) Publications Officer Health Transition Centre (HTC) jeff.marck
anu.edu.au National Centre for Epidemiology 61-6-249-5618 and Population Health (NCEPH) 61-6-249-5614 (fax) Australian National University(ANU) Canberra ACT 0200 Australia NCEPH: http://www-nceph.anu.edu.au HTC: http://www-nceph.anu.edu.au/htcpub.htm HTC Publications: http://www-nceph.anu.edu.au/htc/htcpub.htm Health Transition Review (journal) Dedicated to understanding the cultural, social and behavioural determinants of health Health Transition Series (books) Personal homepage: http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~marck/marck.htm