Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WCHTSALT conference, Utrecht (NL), 28-30 June 1996 L A S T R E M I N D E R call for papers =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= WHAT CHILDREN HAVE TO SAY ABOUT LINGUISTIC THEORIES An Acquisition Symposium on June 28th-30th at the Research Institute for Language and Speech (OTS), Utrecht University CALL FOR PAPERS Much of the research on language acquisition in the generative grammar tradition addresses the general question "How is an adult grammar acquired?" This directly affects methodology: An innateness hypothesis of one form or another is set as the experimental hypothesis, while the supposition that language acquisition is driven by nonlinguistic learning mechanisms is taken as the null hypothesis. Although this paradigm has proven to be extremely fruitful over the years, it has also precluded, of necessity, an additional important potential function for language acquisition research. Since the beginning of theoretical linguistics, it has been well-known that theories of UG can be numerous, and that a criterion of "explanatory adequacy" is needed to distinguish the empirically adequate from the insightful. In this regard, language acquisition research can play an important role. A good test of the explanatory adequacy of a given hypothesis about some aspect of UG is its ability to predict the linguistic performance of children learning an adult grammar. In this regard, language acquisition research offers a potentially rich source of additional information useful for answering the theoretical linguist's question "What exactly does UG consist in?" This symposium is focused on this second potential function of language acquisition research. Therefore, to be accepted, submitted abstracts must meet the following basic requirements: (i) Two (or more) distinct hypotheses in the literature, in any theoretical framework, about any linguistic phenomenon (e.g. weak cross-over, clitic climbing, stress, weak WH-islands, specificity, metalinguistic negation, case, whatever), are presented and compared; (ii) The competing hypotheses are shown to make different predictions about children's linguistic performance, under a given set of conditions, given some set of general assumptions about language processing and first language acquisition; (iii)Acquisition evidence argues in favor of one, and against the other, hypothesis Abstracts, for a 40-minute presentation on any topic in syntax, semantics or phonology, may be no longer than 1000 words (excluding references, diagrams and examples), must be postmarked no later than February 20, 1996 (no e-mail; no fax; no extensions), and should be sent to: WCHTSALT OTS/Utrecht University Trans 10 3512 JK Utrecht The Netherlands. Final selection will be determined by an international panel of experts, some of whom will attend the symposium as commentators. For more information: WCHTSALTMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuelet.ruu.nl. Symposium organizers: Peter Coopmans, Nina Hyams, William Philip and Frank Wijnen. +-------------------------------+ | Frank Wijnen | | Utrecht University -- OTS | | Trans 10 | | 3512 JK Utrecht (NL) | | tel. ++ 31 30 253 6052 | | fax. ++ 31 30 253 6000 | +-------------------------------+
CALL FOR PAPERS ROCKY MOUNTAIN AMERICAN DIALECT SOCIETY The RMADS welcomes proposals for 15-minute presentations at the 50th Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association Annual meeting in Albuquerque, New Mexico, October 24-26, 1996. Authors may submit abstracts of 300 words or less dealing with any aspect of dialects in the United States (both English and other languages) to: Xiaozhao Huang Department of English University of North Dakota Grand Forks, ND 58202-7209 Attn: RMADS Session DEADLINE: March 15, 1996. For additional information: telephone: (701) 777-6393 e-mail: xhuangMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuebadlandss.nodak.edu