Editor for this issue: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar <aristar
linguistlist.org>
Dear Linguists, Some time ago, I posted a query on the List, asking for references and remarks on the `phonological phrase'. Below, I will give a summary of the responses I got, which were very helpful to me. I will also give some more references I found. For their valuable responses, I wish to thank: Erwin Marsi <marsiMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuelet.kun.nl> David Gaatone <dgaatone
ccsg.tau.ac.il> Vera Kamphuis <v.kamphuis
let.kun.nl> Charles Scott <ctscott
facstaff.wisc.edu> John Reighard <reigharj
alpes-net.fr> The reason I am interested in the phonological phrase is that it has been suggested to be a unit of phonological encoding, an articulatory buffer, but at the same time largely dependent on syntactic surface structure ("how largely?" is what most of the discussion is about!). I am currently working on phonological encoding errors in (conduction) aphasia. If `my' patients make more errors with lexical words than they do with function words, it may well be the case that this is because lexical words are what (phonological) phrases depend upon. It has been suggested that the disturbances of some patients "may not involve the formulation of the phonological forms of single words, but rather the insertion of phonological forms into syntactic structures [...]" (p. 124, David Caplan & Gloria Waters, `Issues Arising Regarding the Nature and Consequences of Reproduction Conduction Aphasia', in: S.E. Kohn (Ed.) (1992) Conduction Aphasia). In the speech production process, the construction of the phonological phrase could then be the `level' on which this occurs! - ------ Nespor, Marina et Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Studies in generative grammar, 28. Dordrecht: Foris. Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1984. Phonology and syntax: the relation of sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. As far as French is concerned, Selkirk suggested that the domain of liaison is determined by syntactic structure, in particular that it occurs between specifiers and syntactic heads, but not between heads and their complements (thus providing an explanation for liaison in "un savant Anglais" and absence of liaison in "un savant anglais". If I'm not mistaken, Nespor and Vogel assume the correctness of this analysis, but Yves-Charles Morin documented serious problems with it in: Morin, Yves-Charles et Jonathon Kaye. 1982. The syntactic bases for French liaison. Journal of linguistics 18.291-330. John Reighard - -------- a string of words bearing only one stress.for instance in french: a chain of clitics +verb:je le lui donne, with only one stress on the o of donne. hope this will at least partly satisfy you. david gaatone - -------- WARREN, P., GRABE, E. & NOLAN, F. (1995) Prosody, phonology and parsing in closure ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10 (5), 457-486. Vera Kamphuis - --------- Booij (1996), The phonology of Dutch. Bachenko, Fitzpatrick (1990) A computational grammar of discourse- neutral prosodic phrasing in English, Computational Linguistics 16(3), 155- 170. (a.o. phon. phrase construction of English) Ferreira (1993), Creation of prosody during sentence production, Psychological review, vol. 100, no. 2, 233-253. (Good introduction, with references to other works) Gee, Grosjean (1983, Performance structures: a psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal, Cognitive psychology 15, 411-458. Hayes, B. (1986) The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In: Kiparsky, Youmans (eds.) Phonetics and phonology, vol. 1, Rhythm and meter. San Diego etc., Academic Press, Inc., 201-220. Neijt, A. (1984) Fie-vorming, In: Haan, Trommelen, Zonneveld, Van periferie naar kern, Dordrecht, Foris publications, 169-175. Truckenbrodt, H. (1995). Phonological phrases: their relation to syntax, focus and prominence. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. Erwin Marsi - ----------- I know this term primarily from the era of Trager-Smith phonology and phonological syntax. A phonological phrase is that sequence of segments and internal junctures bounded by one or another of the terminal junctures, i.e. double cross juncture, double bar juncture, or single bar juncture. Such a sequence would also have a pitch contour, e.g. 2 3 1# (the normal tone-rising tone-falling tone, with further down shift at the end (the #) all of which is typical of the intonation on declarative clauses or WH questions in English. I suggest you consult Trager & Smith, Outline of English Structure (1951) or A.A. Hill, Introduction to Linguistic Structures (1958) for further discussion of this. Charles Scott <ctscott
facstaff.wisc.edu> - ----------- Other references: CUTLER, A. (1983b) Speaker's conceptions of the function of prosody. In: A. Cutler & D.R. Ladd (Eds.), Prosody: Models and Measurements (Heidelberg: Springer). DOWNING, G. (1970) Syntactic Structure and Phonological Phrasing in English. Ph.D. diss. (University of Texas, Austin). FERREIRA, F. (1991) Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 210-233. GARRETT, M.F. (1982) Production of speech: observations from normal and pathological language use: In: A. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and Pathology in Cognitive Functions (London: Academic Press) GARRETT, M.F. (1984) The organization of processing structure for language production. Applications to aphasic speech. In: D. Caplan, A.R. Lecours & A. Smith (Eds.), Biological Perspectives on Language (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). GHINI, M. (1993) -formation in Italian: A new proposal. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 12-2, 41-78. HAYES, B. (1989) The Prosodic Hierarchy in Meter. In: P. Kiparsky & G. Youmans (Eds.), Rhythm and Meter (Orlando: Academic Press). HELSLOOT, C.J. (1995) Metrical Prosody: A Template-and- constraint Approach to Phonological Phrasing in Italian: based on the poetry of Giuseppe Ungaretti and Eugenio Montale. doc. diss. University of Amsterdam (Den Haag: Holland Academic Graphics) HULST, H. VAN DER & N. SMITH (Eds.) (1982) The Structure of Phonological Representations. Part II (Dordrecht: Foris). INKELAS, S. & ZEC, D. (Eds.) (1990) The Phonology-Syntax Connection (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press). KAISSE, E.M. (1985) Connected Speech. The Interaction of Syntax and Phonology (Orlando: Academic Press). LADD, D.R. (1986) Intonational phrasing: The case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 311-340. LEVELT, W.J.M. (1989) Speaking: From Intention to Articulation (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press) MIYARA, S. (1981) Phonological Phrase and Phonological Reduction. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 7. 154-183. NESPOR, M. & VOGEL, I. (1979) Clash Avoidance in Italian. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 467-482. NESPOR, M. & VOGEL, I. (1989) On clashes and lapses. Phonology, 8, 261-290. SELKIRK, E.O. (1978) On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. Paper presented at the Conference on Mental Representation in Phonology. IULC, 1980. Published in: T. Fretheim (Ed.) (1981) Nordic Prosody II (Trondheim: TAPIR), 111-140. SELKIRK, E.O. (1980) Prosodic domains in phonology: Sanskrit revisited. In: M. Aronoff and M.-L. Kean (Eds.), Juncture (Studia Linguistica et Philologica 7) (Saratoga, California: Anma Libri). SELKIRK, E.O. (1986) On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 371-405. Greetings! Dirk-Bart den Ouden denouden
let.rug.nl =========================== Dirk-Bart den Ouden Department of Dutch Rijksuniversiteit Groningen P.O. Box 716 9700 AS GRONINGEN Tel: +31 (0)50 - 3637412 ===========================