Editor for this issue: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar <aristar
linguistlist.org>
>I am putting together a reading list for an independent study >course on invented languages, including Esperanto, sign language, >twinspeak, and some science fiction efforts such as Klingon. I'm concerned that the discussion has placed "sign language" in a broad category that has been labelled "invented language". It is a common misconception that signed languages are invented. They are not. They are natural languages in precisely the same sense that English, German, or Navajo are. No one person, no committee, invented "sign language" any more than we can point to the inventor of Spanish. In fact, it is probably best not to use the term "sign language" since it is ambiguous. I prefer to use the term "signed language" for the category, analogous to "spoken languages". When referring to a specific language, it is best to name the language -- American Sign Language, Catalan Sign Language, Japanese Sign Language, and so forth. I also must admit to some concern about considering cases such as Esperanto and Klingon (!) in the same light as twinspeak. While some may say that these are all cases of "invented" languages, surely the differences far outweigh the similarities. Perhaps that is the point of your reading list -- but by placing signed languages, which are not invented languages, in the same category, it makes me question whether you understand the other differences as well. Having said that, you may want to contact my colleague, Jill Morford (morfordMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueunm.edu) for more information about homesign. Sherman Wilcox Associate Professor Dept. of Linguistics University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131 505-277-6353 (v/tty) 505-277-6355 (fax) http://www.unm.edu/~wilcox