Editor for this issue: Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin
emunix.emich.edu>
I am interested in what generative grammarians have to say about language typology. Can anybody please tell me what books or papers to read? Thank you. I'll post a summary. Frank JaretMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I was wondering whether there is a connection between syntactic aspects of a sentence and the pragmatic impact it has, like in topicalisation. In particular, I'm interested in the active/passive distinction and dative alternation in English and Dutch. My intuition says that whereas passivization serves a pragmatic goal, e.g. topicalisation of the 'recipient', this is not true of dative sentences like (1a-b) below: 1a. The widow gave a Mercedes to the church 1b. The widow gave the church a Mercedes Can anyone (dis)confirm my intuition? Pointers to relevant literature would be appreciated. --Robert Hartsuiker (hartsuikerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuenici.kun.nl) Robert J. Hartsuiker NICI, KU Nijmegen PO BOX 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen The Netherlands hartsuiker
nici.kun.nl +31 24 3612608
Sender: Henk Wolf (wolfMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuefa.knaw.nl) Subject: Dutch verbal constructions To: Lowlands-L, the Linguist List Recently I came across the following data: (1) Ze zagen de bergbeklimmers de top bereikt hebben (2) *Ze zagen de bergbeklimmers de top hebben bereikt Does anyone know of literature dealing with the grammaticality distinction in (1) and (2)? Any clues, tips, references? Groet, Henk Wolf wolf
fa.knaw.nl