Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <dizdar
tam2000.tamu.edu>
I am a continuing education student at University of Vermont, taking a Phonetics course as a prerequisite for the SLP masters program. I am planning on doing some research into the glottal stop in Vermont dialect, with the main focus being field interviews. I would appreciate any information, or at least information about resources I could look into, having to do with the history of the glottal stop in Vermont and New England, and how it came to be part of local dialect. (I have found some information about the glottal stop in England, and I assume it was brought here from there.) I realize there was some discussion a few months ago about this type of request. I have done extensive searches in libraries and computer databases. My professors have told me that there isn't much out there on this, and my research so far confirms this. Any help is appreciated; please send any information directly to me. I will be happy to share with the List anything I find out. Charles Barasch Plainfield, VT e-mail: charandrannaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuedelphi.com
I'm looking for examples of ethnic/racial labelling that indicate differences in status (especially human status) for the groups that are labeled. For example: in some Bantu languages, some ethnic outgroups' names are not in the "human" noun class (1/2), while the ingroup's name (to my knowledge) is always in NC1/2. This can be taken to indicate that the outgroup is viewed as not as truly human as the ingroup (and likely inferior to the ingroup). Does anyone know of other examples of morphological/lexical evidence of ethnocentrism (ethnosuperiority?), especially from other language groups and regions? Besides noun class and gender differences, I could imagine labels that are compounds involving animal terms or that are _synchronically_ synonymous with animals or inanimates (if there is evidence that those animals/inanimates are not valued in the culture. (I've yet to decide whether the labeling of only outgroups counts here. There are plenty of examples of groups who, depending upon your interpretation, either don't have an autoethnonym or else have one that is synonymous with "people". Opinions welcome.) Counterexamples to any of my claims especially welcome. Will summarize if there is interest. Lynne Murphy - ------------------------------------------------------------------- M. Lynne Murphy 104lynMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuemuse.arts.wits.ac.za Department of Linguistics phone: 27(11)716-2340 University of the Witwatersrand fax: 27(11)716-8030 Johannesburg 2050 SOUTH AFRICA