Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <dizdar
tam2000.tamu.edu>
I am interested in the typology of NPIs. I assume some languages have 'any' as NPI (as in English), some other languages have indefinite specifiers [either from wh-words or non-wh indefinite pronominal/adjectival/adverbial](as in Greek, Chinese and Japanese) as NPIs, and still others have both of them as NPIs (as in Korean). On the other hand, some languages need the above elements plus concessive (or disjuntive/additive or emphatic) markers to function as NPIs. What about languages you know? If there are enough responses, I will make a summary and post it later. Thank you in advance. Best, Chungmin LeeMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Does anyone know of a language which has ALL of the following syntactic properties: (1) In an NP consisting of a relative clause, the head noun follows the relative clause. (2) The gap relativization strategy is (obligatorily or optionally) used for at least one grammatical function (i.e., subject, object, etc.) of a clause. (3) Null subject and object are NOT allowed. If you know of none, do you know if any (functional or formal) syntactic theory would predict the non-existence of such a language? Ming-wei LeeMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I am a German Postgraduate student in Canterbury, UK, doing a masters in Applied Languages and Computing. I have had the idea of "computerizing" a not yet completed paper dictionary of a German dialect which I have worked on as an assistant for some time. The goal of this project is not so much to provide a possibility for extensive research on the language material, but to make it more easily available for the staff to answer queries. There should also be the possibility of being able to search for conceptually related entries. To use the capabilities of today's technology and not just to produce a reflection of the paper version, I would like to include hypertext links to sound files (to illustrate pronunciation) and to pictures (to illustrate eg. no longer existing objects). In a later version I would perhaps include online links to other dictionaries which were used as sources. The data of this dictionary is, as is the case with most dictionaries, quite varied. There are entries of one line as well as ones filling many pages, there are entries filling only compulsory slots, such as "lemma" and "meaning" and others using all the possible slots. Because of this diversity, it seems problematic to me to feed the data into an ordinary database (let alone how). I was therefore wondering if there is anybody else facing a similar problem, if they had found an existing database system (as eg. MS Access) as a solution to this problem or that they had to create their own one. I would greatly appreciate any helpful hint and will post a summary of them. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jakob Fix, University of Kent at Canterbury, jf4Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueukc.ac.uk ------------------------------------------------------------------