Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <dizdar
tam2000.tamu.edu>
In the 1960s Bergsland repeatedly cited East Greenlandic as a counterexample to Swadesh's idea of a constant rate of lexical change. However, in none of the places I have found did Bergsland publish the actual East Greenlandic vocabulry list he was using (or those from other varieties of Eskimo he was comparing it to), although such a list is referred to as having been distributed at the International Congress of Americanists in 1958, I believe. I am wondering if anybody might actually possess a copy of the list in question. Alexis Manaster Ramer amrMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecs.wayne.edu
I am positing this query on behalf of Lynn LeSueur. Kindly reply directly to her at: LESUEURMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuehelix.mgh.harvard.edu Thanks. My questions concern the use of certain terms in as many languages as possible. First of all, what is the word for symbol? Second, is there the same kind of split in usage that we see in english, specifically the art/lit kind of symbol vs the science/math sense? To clarify that distinction, the art/lit sense of symbol is very rich and multivalent, ambiguous, and decidely concrete. the math/science use of it is quite the opposite, univalent and specified, unambiguous, and decidedly abstract. Third, is the same word used for both uses, or are different terms used for the different senses? Do you know anything about the etymologies of this/ese word/s? The next questions involve metaphor. First, what is the term for metaphor, and its etymology? Second, is it the case that speakers use it interchangeably with symbol in the art/lit sense the way we do? For example, we say, "He meant that symbolically," just as easily as we say, "He meant that metaphorically." The last questions involve analogy; are the same as for metaphor. First, what is the word for analogy, and its etymology? Second, is it used interchangeably with metaphor as it is in English, like "He drew a metaphor," and "He drew an analogy"? Thanks so much.
The following argument is invalid: (1) The temperature is 90 degrees (2) The temperature is rising (3) So, 90 degrees is rising My hypothesis is that, the form of this argument is that of the following argument but disguised (4) Inflation is at 4 percent (5) Inflation is rising (6) * At 4 percent is rising Here it is clear why the argument won't go through: "at 4 percent" is some kind of locative argument. My question is, are there any languages which make it clear that the NP "90 degrees" in (1) is a locative: ie where "90 degrees" is assigned locative case or must have a locative preposition as in (7) The temperature is at 90 degrees Thanks, Brian Ulicny Limbex Corporation 13160 Mindanao Way, Suite 234 Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 ulicnyMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuelimbex.com