Editor for this issue: Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin
emunix.emich.edu>
I originally sent the included message to a publisher but up till now have not received any answer. I hope someone with access to the requested information could help me as I do need the details quite urgently. Your help will be much appreciated! Wannie Carstens e-mail: AFNWAMCMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuePUKNET.PUK.AC.ZA ========= Walter de Gruyter Inc. USA Dear Sir/Madam I would appreciate it if I could receive a list of the publications in the series RESEARCH IN TEXT THEORY since 1990. I do need the titles, authors/ editors, etc. of all the volumes in this series SINCE 1990 (i.e. the last volume in this series that is available in our University's library: Vol. 15 on Intertextuality). It is difficult to obtain it along the normal routes (and also very time-consuming!) and I need it quite urgently. At present I am busy with a book on Afrikaans text linguistics and I do need to know what has been published in this series the past few years in order to update my own theoretical background. If there is an updated brochure available on this series I would appreciate it if it could be mailed to me (address below). I really do hope you will be able to help me! Thank you in advance for the help provided! Wannie Carstens ........................................................................ Prof. Wannie Carstens Dept. Afrikaans en Nederlands/Dept. of Afrikaans and Dutch Personeelbussie 493/Staff postal box 493 Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir CHO/Potchefstroom University for CHE POTCHEFSTROOM 2520 Suid-Afrika/South Africa Tel.: (0148) 299-1485/6 (w)/299-1140 (h) Faks./Fax: (0148) 299-1562 E-pos/E-mail: AFNWAMC
PUKNET.PUK.AC.ZA
I would be interested in hearing a discussion of the similarities and differences between Theoretical Linguistics and Applied Lingusitics, with some ideas of areas of specializiation where one would be more appropropriate than the other. Alice Harman Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs aharmanMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueteleport.com
Hello, I am adressing this query to the Linguist List as I am interested in an 'expert' comment: In his commentary on Searles article "Consciousness, Explanatory Inversion and Cognitive Science" (Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, 1990), Chomsky gives four sentences as an example: (1) John is too clever to catch (2) John is too clever to be caught (3) John is easy to catch (4) John is easy to be caught (cited from N. Chomsky: Accessibility 'in principle'. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, pp. 600-601) Chomsky writes that the sentences (1)-(3) are regarded by the english speaker Mary as true under certain circumstances, but (4) "she regards as somehow deviant" (p. 600). As I am not a native speaker of english, I am not sure about the meaning of the word "deviant", nor can I make a statement about the grammaticality of the sentences above. So please tell me, if you would find sentence (4) as ungrammatical or if it is a grammatical sentence but in its meaning in some sense strange or if you think of it something else. (I would also be interested in your understanding of the word "deviant" here.) I would be glad to receive some helpful answers. Please reply directly to the address below. Thank you in advance. Thomas Schoeneborn student at Linguistic Dept., Univ. of Muenster, GermanyMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue