Editor for this issue: Ljuba Veselinova <lveselin
emunix.emich.edu>
Dear Linguists, In extracting a corpus of Russian case-marked nouns I encountered the following problem: What case has to be assigned to forms like v lesu v shkafu v prudu v uglu v tazu na snegu na mostu na polu ? It is not the dative because the stress pattern is different in most cases and it is not the prepos'su. (dative) Ja vspominaju o le'se (prepositional) ' Ja priblizhajus k lesu. (dative) Ja vspominaju o'. but: Ja stoju v lesu. It seems to affect only masculine nouns with a very typical locative use. Are these situations where prepositional and locative dissociate morphologically so that Russian in fact should be viewed as having 7 cases? Since I am not a linguist any help or references would be greatly appreciated. Please contact me directly at vkempeMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueuoft02.utoledo.edu --Vera Kempe Department of Psychology University of Toledo Toledo, OH 43606-3390 phone: 419 5302417
Perhaps the answer to the subject query is that, historically, nasal segments always derive from earlier nasal segments. Can anyone provide a clearcut example of nasal segments being introduced ab nihilo? I would love to learn of an attested phonological process that has no nasals on the left, but has them on the right. An almost plausible hypothetical example would be d -> n / t _ V -AMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Greetings linguists! I am a grad student in French linguistics studying anglicisms in the French popular press. In mid-February, I saw a reference to Bernard Quemada's definition of "peregrinisme" on another list and have been unable to find either the original Quemada work with a definition or anyone who knows of it. Any leads would be most appreciated. _cinq clous_ Melanie Misanchuk University of CalgaryMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue