Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <dizdar
tam2000.tamu.edu>
Dear Netters, Sorry for cross-posting to those Info-Childes members. I am working a paper counting lexical density for written text, and I have problems to extract out the lexical words. Lexical density is inspired by Halliday's Spoken and Written Language (p. 63, 1989). He suggests using entries listed in Roget's Thesaurus (1982, 1984) as the criteria to count words as lexical ones. However, as lexical words are terrible huge, it won't be possible, nor practical, to build them into a corpus, and run the corpus in the IBM-PC to compare with the data file so that all the lexical words can be thrown out (using a language analysis program called CLAN, with command "FREQ +d1 +sMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuelexicalfile datafile.") I am wondering if there is a database collecting all words other than those listed in the Roget's Thesaurus (hence they are only grammatical words). If this is the case, this database will be extremely smaller than the original Roget's. Then, it will be much easier to attach it to the command line so that all lexical words from the data file can be extracted (using "FREQ +d1 -s
grammaticalfile datafile.") Any responses will be gratefully received. Su-hsun, research student IOE, U. of London teemsht
ioe.ac.uk
I am posting this message for a colleague in the psychology department and who is not affiliated to linguist. Please send your replies direct to him (Prof. Alain Desrochers) at the following address: DAMCH at acadvm1.uottawa.ca Thanks Paul Hirschbuhler ======================================================================== Dear Colleagues, I am undertaking a research project on the cognitive processes that underly syllabification. One of my goals is to compare French and English syllabification. I am approaching this topic from a psycholinguistic perspective and I am finding the theoretical foundations of the concept of syllable somewhat fragmented. Can anyone in the Linguistics community offer me some guidance. I am looking for: 1. A clear definition of the syllable, preferably theory-driven. 2. A relatively comprehensive theory or model of syllabification. 3. A computational theory for automated syllabification by computer. I have no way of knowing for sure if what I am looking for indeed exists. If it does I would be most grateful for any references, reprints or simply clues you may want to send me. Thank you in advance. Sincerely, ALAIN DESROCHERS Cognitive Psychology Laboratory Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive School of Psychology Ecole de psychologie University of Ottawa Universite d'Ottawa 125 University Dr., Rm 407A 125 Prom. Universite, Salle 407A Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1N 6N5 Canada K1N 6N5 Tel: Off: (613) 562-5800 Ext. 4291 Lab: (613) 562-5800 Ext. 4289 Fax: (613) 562-5147 E-mail: DAMCHMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueACADVM1.UOTTAWA.CA
A colleague has asked me to post the following request: Can anyone suggest suitable reading material, approximately 500 pages, about "clinical linguistics", i.e., linguistics as a basis for speech therapists/correctionists? No previous knowledge of linguistics should be presupposed. The language should be English (or a Scandinavian language, but we more or less know that such material does not exist in those languages). Helge Dyvik - ------------------------------------------------------------------ Helge Dyvik Department of Linguistics and Comparative Literature Section for Linguistic Studies University of Bergen Phone: +47 55 212261 Sydnesplass 7 Fax: +47 55 589354 N-5007 Bergen, Norway E-mail: helge.dyvikMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuefoli.uib.no - ------------------------------------------------------------------