Editor for this issue: Annemarie Valdez <avaldez
emunix.emich.edu>
In need to correct a remark in Wald's Summary on Unusual Sound Changes (t > h): >In further communication, when I suggested the preceding criticism to John, he >said that he was aware of it and agreed. He added that the extension of *t >(add appropriate features) > c/j to /_ back vowel might have been facilitated >by retroflexion of the back vowels, something he had personally observed in >some other Southeast Amerind languages, e.g., Quapaw, and is an areal feature. In fact this comment was offered by Robert Rankin, with whom I was corresponding on the side, and whose personal observations it reflects. I think I said as much, but perhaps I was unclear. My apologies to Rankin and to Wald. John E. Koontz NIST:CAML:DCISD 888.02 Boulder, CO john.koontzMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuenist.gov
- -------------------------------Messages------------------------------------ Further to david Branner's comments on what he considered doubtful items in Lloyd holliday's list (which I didn't see), the pronunciation 'extrordinary' (merging the a with o, which is stressed) and the pronunciation 'febuary' , both listed as American are widespread in British English (as are the alternatives). Tom Bloor > > - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- LINGUIST List: Vol-7-52.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue