Editor for this issue: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar <aristar
tam2000.tamu.edu>
Since many members of the Linguistic Society of America read this list, I hope it won't be considered off-topic to discuss LSA business here. What do the readers of LINGUIST think of the LSA's criteria of "political correctness" that meeting sites must pass? The criteria have changed over the years. First, meetings could only be held in states that had passed the Equal Rights Amendment. Later, meeting sites were required to toe the line on gay rights (which almost kept us from meeting in New Orleans, but a special dispensation was made). According to the LSA Bulletin, if I remember right, the latest addition is that meeting sites must have an anti-age-discrimination statute. However worthy these causes might be on their own merits, I am concerned about the LSA's use of political criteria for several reasons: - The LSA's mission is to promote linguistics throughout the country, not just parts of it. The gay rights criterion alone excluded more than 25 states from eligibility to host a meeting. - Because the criteria are a moving target, their effect is to confine meetings to those parts of the country where legislative change proceeds fastest. New York and California may be able to keep up, but it's unreasonable to demand that all 50 states do everything in unison. Before Georgia catches up, the criteria will have changed again. - Political activism unrelated to linguistics impairs the LSA's ability to speak with authority when a political issue comes up that *does* involve linguistic expertise, such as bilingual education. Am I way out in right field, or do other members or prospective members feel the same way I do? As a resident of a state that has always been _civitas non grata_ to the LSA, I've had this grating on my nerves for a long time. Comments welcome. - Michael A. Covington http://www.ai.uga.edu/faculty/covington/ Artificial Intelligence Center <>< The University of Georgia Unless specifically indicated, I am Athens, GA 30602-7415 U.S.A. not speaking for the University.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue