Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
Regarding Martin Haspelmath's recent posting on the Linguist list. I am amazed to find that anybody is seriously counting SEGMENTS to determine word length (Nettle 95). Hello? Surely the big generalization is on word-length in terms of SYLLABLES and number of distinctive features (or number of phonemes). If a language allows really complex syllables it doesn't need lots of them per morpheme (eg, German); if a languages has really beautiful syllables it MUST have a lot of them per morpheme (Italian). Comparing English strengths and Hawaiian honolulu 'tourist trap' as two words with eight segments misses something important. Chinese morphemes, PIE roots, etc. are ALL monosyllabic, but they vary greatly in terms of number of segments and number of distinctive features. In many languages we find a minimal word requirement (McCarthy & Prince 1986) of two moras or two syllables; in some languages we find the same for roots (Golston 1991). But in no language do we find ANY correlation between number of segments and words or between number of segments and roots (not even in Arabic! which has bi-, tri- and quadra-literal roots). Has anyone tried counting something reasonable (number of syllables or feet) and seeing if it correlated with something else? Chris Golston Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft Heinrich Heine Universitaet Duesseldorf Universitaetsstr. 1 40225 Duesseldorf Germany Home 49-211-691-1247 Office 49-211-811-5133Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue