Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
SUMMARY: palatal nasals A while ago I asked for examples of languages with word-final palatal nasals that contrast with alveolar and velar nasals. Here are the replies. Thanks to Lance Eccles, Jakob Dempsey, Rod Johnson, Mark Mandel, Paul Foulkes, Geoffrey Sampson, John Koontz, James Harris, Suzanne Kemmer, Ilona Kassai, Bruce A. Connell, Mariana Maduell, Keith Goeringer, David Stampe, who contributed to this summary. The languages Catalan, Vietnamese, Cambodian, Written Burmese, Sulung, Luo (Western Nilotic), Hungarian, Munda (Austroasiatic) and Dinka were suggested. Wen-Chao Li Lady Margaret Hall Oxford University ......................................... LUO From: kemmerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueruf.rice.edu (Suzanne E Kemmer) I am doing fieldwork on Luo, a Nilo-Saharan language of Kenya, which has the contrast in final nasals which you are looking for: (~ indicates palatalization; ng represents the velar nasal, not an n-g sequence; and c is a palatal stop) un 'you plural' cun~ 'heart' cung 'stand' (I haven't indicated vowel length or tone) - Suzanne Kemmer .......................................................... LUO From: rcj
mail.msen.com (Rod Johnson) The Western Nilotic language Luo (also known as Dholuo) has contrastive final nasals at the bilabial, alveolar, palatal and velar places, and used to have dental nasals as well (they have since merged with alveolars). I can't cite any minimal pairs off the top of my head, but Luo abounds in forms like _chuny_ 'liver', _apany_ 'one-legged stool' and _piny_ 'land' (where the _ny_ digraph is the standard spelling for the palatal nasal). There is also, interestingly, a series of prenasalized stops in Luo that corresponds to the plain nasals--the two series alternate with one another in various morphological contexts, but they are phonemically distinct. Final voiced segments are mostly prohibited, except in certain deverbal nouns, so there aren't many examples, but forms like _puonj_ 'teacher' are found (where _nj_ is the voiced palatal prenasalized stop). Oh, I can cite one minimal pair: the _chuny_ above and _chung'_ 'to stand' (where _ng'_ is the velar nasal). I'm sure there are others. I hope this is useful. Luo is not terribly well known in the literature, but I can send some references if you're interested. I think similar phenomena occur in other Nilotic languages: for instance, in Shilluk, _kyEN_ 'horse' (where _E_ is IPA epsilon and _N_ is the palatal nasal), and in Dinka-Nuer, but I'm not as conversant with them. Rod Johnson rcj
msen.com ................................................... MUNDA (phylum Austroasiatic) From: stampe
hawaii.edu (David Stampe) Many of the Munda (phylum Austroasiatic) languages of India have alveo-palatal vs alveolar, velar, and labial nasals in syllable and word final position. Most have the corresponding non-nasal stops as well, though occasionally there are gaps (Sora has b d j but not g finally, though it has m n ~n and ng finally). In most of these languages, the palatal nasal (and palatal stops, usually j [dzh]), if it closes the syllable (i.e. if a vowel does not follow in the same word) causes the preceding vowel to have a palatal [i-like] transitional glide, which considerably aids in hearing the distinction between the various lingual nasals. If you need further information - examples, references, etc. - please let me know by email what you need. David Stampe <stampe
hawaii.edu> Dept. of Linguistics, Univ. of Hawai`i/Manoa, Honolulu HI 96822 ..................................................................... DINKA, CATALAN From: connellb
vax.ox.ac.uk Subject: final palatal nasals Wenchao Catalan I think contrasts alveolar and palatal nasals (but not velars) in final position. Dinka (a NIlotic language spoken in Sudan) contrasts labial, alveolar, palatal and velar nasals finally. A similar situation may exist in other languages of that region. Bruce ........................................................... CATALAN From: maduell
hawaii.edu (Mariana Maduell) I can't think of any contrasts offhand, but Catalan has word-final palatal nasals, represented by ny (e.g. any `year'). These came in with the dropping of some final vowels (the Spanish cognate is obviously an~o, Italian anno). Mariana Maduell e-mail: maduell
hawaii.edu P.O. Box 62206 http://www2.hawaii.edu/~maduell Honolulu HI, 96839 ...................................................... CATALAN From: jharris
MIT.EDU Catalan (though unfortunately not a Sino-Tibetan lg.) contrasts word-final palatal nasals (spelled *ny* in the standard orthography) with alveolar, velar, and labial (which you didn't mention) nasals --all of which appear plentifully i n common native words. The only qualification is that the velar nasal in phonetic representations is from underlying Nas plus velar obstruent (the latter deleted in word-final position but not before a V); the labial, palatal, and alveolar nasals are all underlying. Examples: any 'year' han 'they have' flam 'flan - the custard' baN 'bank' (N=engma) James Harris ................................................................ CATALAN, VIETNAMESE, CAMBODIAN From: leccles
laurel.ocs.mq.edu.au (Lance Eccles) Catalan distinguishes a word-final palatal nasal from both a velar and an alveolar/ dental nasal: bany = bath ban = edict banc [baN] = bench; bank I believe Vietnamese makes such a distinction (at least in some dialects), and this this is represented in spelling by -nh, -n, -ng. You could check for details in Nguyen Dinh Hoa, Speak Vietnamese (Tuttle, Rutland, 1966) -- there may be a later edition -- and in Laurence Thompson, A Vietnamese Grammar (U of Washington Press, Seattle, 1965). All three also occur in Cambodian. Check Judith Jacob, Introduction To Cambodian (Oxford U Press, 1968), p. 22. -Lance Eccles .......................................... VIETNAMESE From: geoffs
cogs.susx.ac.uk (Geoffrey Sampson) It depends how exact you are about what counts as a "palatal" sound. If you are willing to be a little loose, Vietnamese (at least in its Northern variety, traditionally regarded as the standard variety) should count. It has syllable-final sounds written in the normal Vietnamese orthography -ch, -nh, but they are not exactly lamino-alveolar, which is what "palatal" standardly means; I describe them as "fronted velar". They have very restricted distribution, but there would be words in which they contrast with ordinary final velars written -c, -ng: if the latter consonants are preceded by a vowel spelled as "a" with a lunette (short mark) above it, the resulting syllable-final would be identical to a final written -ach or -anh except for the precise position of the velar closure. The -ch and -nh syllables seem to result from earlier syllables ending with ordinary velars, to which a sound-change applied altering both vowel and consonant. The facts were discussed in a fair degree of phonetic detail in my first-ever academic publication, "Hanoi dorsal finals", BSOAS vol. 32 pp. 115-34, 1969. .... I'm reconstructing memories of things I knew about 30 years ago but have scarcely revisited since; but broadly, what seemed to have happened in VN on the basis of internal reconstruction was that earlier long tense vowels before velar consonants were made short, lax, lowered, and their frontness or rounding was spread to colour the velar consonant also, so that a velar consonant after a front vowel became fronted, and a velar consonant after a back rounded vowel became labialized or even became a k^p coarticulation. Down the years I have occasionally seen information about Southern Chinese dialects which suggested to me that this might have been an areal sound-change which affected them too. (As I'm sure you know, Vietnamese is a language which genetically was not Sino-Tibetan at all but which acquired so much material from Chinese that modern Vietnamese looks like a Chinese dialect with a minority of vocabulary items that have no Chinese cognates.) I always meant to look further into this, but there was never time and my career took me in other directions. I would say again, though, that despite the way that the romanized script invented for Vietnamese by a 17c Jesuit missionary chooses to write them, the "fronted velar" final consonants are definitely not phonetically identical to initial palatal consonants (which VN has), and are not "palatal" in the strict sense which that term usually bears in phonetics. Since I don't know the motive of your enquiry, I don't know whether they are likely to be relevant for your purposes or not. Geoffrey Sampson ........................................................................ HUNGARIAN From: kassai
nytud.hu (kassai) Sorry to report on a language other than sino-tibetan which contrasts word-final palatal nasals with word final alveolar nasals: Hungarian. It is a member of the Ugric branch of the Finno-Ugric language family. It is closely related to Vogul, Ostyak (West Here are some minimal pairs where the first member contains palatal nasal (<ny>in spelling) while the second one shows up alveolar nasal (<n>in spelling) . The ' marks the length of the vowel before it: ke'ny pleasure/ke'n sulphur ide'ny season/ide'n this year Uny geographical name/un be fed up ve'ny prescription/ve'n old And now your new question. The palatal nasal has always been a genuin phoneme of the Hungarian sound system. It goes back to the finno-ugric palatal nasal. A s for velar nasal, on the other hand, it is'nt an independent phoneme, it is only an allophonic variant. Ilona Kassai, Linguistics Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budap est. ................................................... HUNGARIAN From: keg
violet.berkeley.edu (Keith GOERINGER) I can't give any Sino-Tibetan data, but Hungarian does contrast at least the palatals and alveolar nasals word-finally. There are also word-final velar nasals, but I'm not sure that they're entirely pure nasals -- there might be some [g] coming through as well. I can't think of a perfect three-way minimal triad, but some minimal pairs (assuming the velar nasals are just nasals, unless it doesn't matter) would be: la'ny 'girl' la'ng 'flame' sza'n 'pities' (verb) sza'nj 'pity' (command) (the digraphs /ny/ and /nj/ are the palatal nasal; the digraph /ng/ represents eng; the digraph /sz/ is [s]; and the apostrophe marks historic length which is qualit(at)ively distinguished in modern Hungarian) A good place for finding more pairs (or possibly triads) would be a reverse dictionary -- I can give the name of one, if you want. Also, as the second example shows, in verbal morphology, the subjunctive (or imperative) forms generally is marked by palatalization of the root consonant. So if you seek out verbs whose stems end in -n, that should give you some nice minimal pairs. Keith Goeringer UC Berkeley Slavic Languages & Literatures keg
violet.berkeley.edu ..................................................... BURMESE, SULUNG From: ufjakobq
ms5.hinet.net (jakob) Written Burmese appears to have such finals, but this is probably an artifact of the script, the actual pronuciations (present and historical) are/appear to have been quite different. Sulung (spoken at the Eastern end af the Himalayan chain -Arunachal pradesh - marginally belongs to this type. It is found in an area where the Sino-Tibetan languages tend to have a "Mon-Khmer" character. Speaking of which, Diffloth's proto-Waic has contrastive palatal nasal endings, which is based on similar finals being found in many modern Wa (and other ?) Mon-Khmer languages. - -Jakob Dempsey (Taiwan) ....................................................... AUSTRALIAN LANGUAGES From: koontz
boulder.nist.gov (John E. Koontz) Subject: Nasals Look at Australian languages. A good starting reference might be the volume in the Cambridge Language Series. John E. Koontz NIST:CAML:DCISD 888.02 Boulder, CO john.koontz
nist.gov