Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
As Marina Yaguello points out, the psychoanalytical literature makes very interesting observations about language in dreams. For instance, Freud in "The Interpretation of Dreams" (originally published 1900 as "Die Traumdeutung") makes the claim that "all the material making up the content of a dream is in some way derived from experience." He then gives an illustrative example based on Delboeuf's (1885) experience. Delboeuf dreams about some lizards and a plant of which he knew the name of in the dream: "Asplenium ruta muralis." When he was awake, Delboeuf knew the Latin names of very few plants and he did not consciously know the term "Asplenium." He was able to confirm that there actually was a plant called "Asplenium ruta muraria,' a name which he had slightly distorted in his dream. 16 years later, Delboeuf discovered that 18 years earlier he had actually written out the name of a great many plants in Latin as part of a present involving an album of pressed flowers. He found that he actually *had* written out the name "Asplenium ruta muraria" at the dictation of a botanist. Freud adds a footnote to this discussion in 1914 where he attributes to Vaschide (1911) the remark that"it has often been observed that in dreams people speak foreign languages more fluently and correctly than in waking life." [Vaschide: Le sommeil et les reves.Paris 1911]. This aside, I think it is interesting to notice that besides abilities to fluently speak a foreign language due to whatever reason, in dreams also our perceptual abilities can be quite different than is possible in our conscious life. For instance, not only can we dream of being on another planet or somewhere else it would seem we have never been, we can also see things in ways that are not possible in waking life, e.g., perhaps we can see through solid material or see everything at once or else dimensions are unlike they are in waking life. We can also physically feel things in our dreams in ways that are not possible in waking life- for example being able to put our hand through solid matter or we can awaken with a vivid tactile memory of something we couldn't possibly have ever touched- When the senses are involved in our perception of things in ways that are not possible in waking life, it is not necessary to conclude that perceptions in dreams use other mechanisms than they do in waking life (that they would be "aperceptual"). I suppose it would be plausible that our dreams can simulate perception through biochemical means or whatever so that our dreams are not aperceptual (in contrast to the earlier claim on the list that language in dreams is alinguistic). Since I don't really know how the senses work, this last point is admittedly naive speculation, but it would seem easier to explain impossible memories of seeing and feeling in a straightforward way than knowledge of a second language we don't really know (unless Jung's collective unconscious gives us access to everyone's UG or whatever...!) In any case, when we consider language and view dreams as a kind of communication between the conscious and unconscious self, then it is obvious that creative linguistic mechanisms are very central to dreams. For instance, in the Freudian interpretation of dreams, roughly speaking, dreams can be understood as having some kind of meaning for the dreamer which can be gleaned through word association. The dream might be about something made out of "wood" when the intended communication is "would" or perhaps the dream mentions a shopping "mall" when the intended communication is "maul," etc. Given the validity of this view of dreams as communication between the unconscious and conscious self, the unconscious self's application of linguistic knowledge about sound meaning correspondences and pragmatics is central to dreams. Metaphors can also figure prominently in dreams: you might dream of someone knitting without any yarn or needles and upon awakening describe the literal content of the dream in a way that makes its posible metaphorical message of someone "going through the motions" clear. ******* Patricia Schneider-ZiogaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue