Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
Summmary to English Strong V query Many Thanks to the following people for their responses to my recent query regarding recent (since 1990) theoretical work which touches on English strong verb morphology: Bernd Wiese (Berlin, de), Chris Golston (Dusseldorf,de) Josep h Tomei (Sapporo, jp), Lynne Cahill (Sussex, uk), Shannon McEwen (Alberta, ca.), Dirk Janssen (nijmegen, nl). (No u.s. responses oddly enough). The search turned up a number of interesting looking articles in a variety of research traditions, to wit: -Bloomer, Robert. 1994: System-Congruity and the Participles of Modern German and Modern English: A Study in Natural Morphology. Hamburg. Buske. (=Beitr$BgH(Je zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft. 6). -Cahill, Lynne J. ``Syllable-based Morphology'', in COLING-90, Vol.3 pp.48-53, Helsinki, 1990. -Cahill, Lynne J. ``Syllable-based Morphology for Natural Language Processing'', CSRP 181, School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex, 1990 (DPhil dissertation). -Golston, Chris ``direct optimality theory:representation as pure markedness'' (to appear in Language Dec. 1996?) - Hare, Mary and Jeff Elman (1995) Learning and morphological change. Cognition 56, 61-98 -Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alterations. Univ. of Chicago Press - Ling, Charles and Marin Marinov (1993) Answering the connectionist challenge: a symbolic model of learning the past tenses of English verbs. Cognition 49, 235-290 - MacWhinney on Ling & Marinov, comment on above article in same volume - Marcus (1995) Cognition, short paper about multilayer nets. - Plunkett, Kim and V Marchman, 1993 "From rote learning to system building: acquiring verbal morphology in children and connectionist nets" Cognition 1993Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue