Editor for this issue: Annemarie Valdez <avaldez
emunix.emich.edu>
About a year ago, someone at the Soros Foundation told me that my Czech state certification in general Czech proficiency was "about a 5", on some scale used in the United States. I never got any further clarification, but yesterday I met another person who was familiar with some scale of this type for Russian, but was also very vague about what the scale is, who administers such exams, etc. Does anyone know any specifics about this? Also, in language self-teaching books I've seen references to something called "EC threshold level". What is that all about? James KirchnerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Inquiry: Is a reader of a book really an "addressee," or is it not? Concerning the notion of the "addressee", Lyons in his _Semantics_ remarks that the addressee (the receiver of a signal) is expected by the speaker (the sender of a signal) to "pay attention to, or respond to, the signal" (Lyons 1977:34). Although responding to a signal without paying attention to it is not completely impossible (e.g. a kid saying "no" to anything he/she is asked), it is very rare under normal circumstances. So, I assume that an addressee is someone who is expected to do the following by the speaker: 1) paying attention to the signal from the speaker, or 2) paying attention and responding to the signal from the speaker. When the notion of an "addressee" is discussed, a typical example is face-to-face conversation where the speaker sends a signal to the addressee who is normally expected to pay attention as well as respond to the signal. Also, it is normal in a situation like this that turn- taking (exchanging the roles of the speaker and the addressee) occurs. According to Lyon's remark, however, a reader of a book or a person listening to a speech on a radio may also be referred to as an "addressee" even though there is no expectation for responding to the signal. Although turn-taking is not completely impossible in this kind of examples, generally there is no expectation for it -- that is, a reader of a book COULD respond to its author, but it is generally not expected. I am interested in the distinction between these two kinds of "addressees" and wondering if there is some research conducted on this or related topics. Please send responses to this inquiry to: ynakazatoMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueguvax.georgetown.edu Thank you. Yuji Nakazato East Asian Languages Georgetown University Washington DC U.S.A.
Dear All,
As part of my research for a lecture on the Commercial Reality of
Dialogue Systems, I would like to ask for pointers to any systems on
sale to-day which incorporate a speech or text dialogue front-end.
Ironically, in the past (mid 1980s) these were the applications of
language technology par excellence, usually giving access to SQL
databases, and names such as Intellect, Q&A, Themis and Parlance are
well known, though surprisingly difficult to find running these days.
It is much harder to find modern instances of the species, despite the
flourishing state of the underlying theoretical field of dialogue
simulation, attested e.g. by this year's University of Twente
Conference on this theme
http://wwwseti.cs.utwente.nl/Parlevink/twlt/
or the Budapest summer school
http://www.ttt.bme.hu
http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/elsnet/summerschool96.html
Partly perhaps, the ground has been taken over by multimodal interfaces.
("This may be dialog, Captain, but not as we know it.") But even there,
there does not seem to be a lot available in the stores as yet.
If people would be kind enough to send me references (and indeed
opinions or anecdotes) on new systems that are beyond the research
stage (preferably on sale), or old systems that are still available, I
should be happy to publish a summary.
Sincerely
Nicholas Ostler
Batheaston Villa, 172 Bailbrook Lane
Bath BA1 7AA England
+44-1225-85-2865 fax +44-1225-85-9258
nostler
chibcha.demon.co.uk
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue