Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <dizdar
tam2000.tamu.edu>
Greetings to all, I am writing to ask if anyone would be willing to share course materials with me for an introductory History of the English language course for undergraduate non-ling majors. It will be my first time teaching this course. I am reviewing Pyles & Algeo and Baugh & Cable as texts; any other suggestions or any remarks on these two would be appreciated. I am particularly interested in supplementary reading suggestions and suggestions for video materials (other than 'Story of English', which I know about), and suggestions for small projects or related books for book report assignments. (Books should be easy enough for non-ling. people and linuistophobes.) If anyone would be willing to share a syllabus, or has a syllabus on the Web, I'd appreciate seeing that too. I will post a summary to the list. Thanks in advance! Johanna = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Johanna Rubba Assistant Professor, Linguistics = English Department, California Polytechnic State University = San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 = Tel. (805)-756-0117 E-mail: jrubbaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueoboe.aix.calpoly.edu = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Can anybody recommend a textbook for an undergraduate course on Linguistics and Literature? The course will be taught in an English dept and the students will presumably have little to no background in Linguistics. I'm already familiar with Traugott & Pratt (1980) and Leech & Short (1981). I'd greatly appreciate references to more recent texts that have been used successfully with undergraduate literature students. Thanks very much. I'll post a summary afterwards. Rich Epstein (repsteinMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueacpub.duke.edu)
Dear Linguists, Our chair of Applied Linguistics at Chemnitz University, Germany has just recently been set up and we are now confronted with the task of shaping the profile of our courses of study. In connection with this we have repeatedly hit upon the elusive and dodgy nature of the concept and practice of Applied Linguistics as such. We were now thinking of shedding some light on existing perceptions of Applied Linguistics and current trends in Applied Linguistics curricula and research by conducting a little questionnaire, We thought that the AILA congress in Finland this summer would be an excellent occasion to put this envisaged project into practice. As the Linguist List is frequently bombarded with all sorts of queeries we were wondering whether you wouldn't perhaps by any chance happen to know if similar questionnaires were conducted in the past. If so would you please let us know about them and send us all the details available on them. Also, connections to people who have experience in this particular area would be welcome. Thank you very much for your kind efforts. Prof.Dr. Martin Stegu Angewandte Sprachwissenschaft TU Chemnitz-Zwickau D-09107 Chemnitz Tel. (49) 371 531 4551 Fax (49) 371 531 2950 e-mail: martin.steguMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuephil.tu-chemnitz.de
Dear linguists: I am going to teach a course on 'Languages in contact' and I would like to know if there is a handbook (or handbooks) that resume all main principles and concepts on this subject. I know specific bibliography about certain languages but a general handbook for this case would be interesting. Thank you very much on advance Maria Jose Serrano mjserranoMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueull.es La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
Dear Linguists, I am a Sanskritist engaged in a study of verba dicendi [words referring to speech and speaking] in early Sanskrit. I am interested in knowing of such studies [particularly of verbs] in other languages, or of general studies of pre-technical metalinguistic speculations. Are there studies of the illocutionary force of words like "to say", "to talk", "to speak", "to discuss", "to declare", beyond those of Austin & Searle, which can be recommended? I have also resorted to the semiotics of discourse deriving from Saussure. Other references to relevant studies will be gratefully acknowledged and forwarded to the list. Sincerely, George ThompsonMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue