Editor for this issue: T. Daniel Seely <dseely
emunix.emich.edu>
Dear subsribers I posted a query for mora-time languages several months ago. I got many helpful information from contributors. I greatly appreciated them. I summarized the list of mora-timed languages by contributors. This is the second summary of moraic languages. (1) CONTRIBUTORS Thank you very much to the following contributors. Margaret Hall Dunn dunnMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuehaskins.yale.edu Tapani Salminen tasalmin
cc.helsinki.fi Hartmut Haberland hartmut
ruc.dk Steven Schaufele fcosws
prairienet.org Kumiko Makihara kumiko
u.washington.edu Pier Marco Bertinetto bertinet
sns.it John E. Koontz koontz
boulder.nist.gov Satoshi Uehara suehara
wellesley.edu San Duanmu duanmu
snoopy.ling.lsa.umich.edu Rick Mc Callister rmccalli
sunmuw1.muw.edu Rod Johnson rcj
mail.msen.com Allan R. King mccay
jet.es Bruce Connell connellb
vax.ox.ac.uk (2) WHAT IS MORAIC LANGUAGES Mainly I felt that there are many ideas about moraic languages. It is difficult to reach consensus for every scholars. Rod Johnson wrote: Moraic languages are those in which the mora plays a part in the phonology or the metrical system. > Kenneth Pike's _Phonetics_ (or perhaps _Phonemics_?) in > the distinction between mora-timing and syllable-timing > languages. There were a number of phonetic studies in the > 1950s and 1960 attempting to either establish or deny the > vailidty of the distinction, but it seems no definitive > consensus was ever reached. Rod Johnson wrote: Let me just point out, as a matter of terminology, > that "mora-timing" does not mean "moraic". In a mora-timing > language, each mora takes approximately the same time to > pronounce--thus a heavy (2-mora) syllable will take twice as long as > a light one. This phenomenon is also called "isochrony, and is > mainly a phonetic one. "Moraic" is a phonological phenomenon, in > which a language is sensitive to the heavy/light distinction, > regardless of timing (especially in stress or accent). So a > language could be moraic but not mora-timing. The two ideas are > quite different. (3) LIST OF MORAIC LANGUAGES SANSKRIT Steven Schaufele wrote: Sanskrit is a mora-counting language in the same way that Latin and Classical Greek are. Short vowels count as 1 mora, long vowels as 2, and any consonant in the coda (not only nasals) counts as 1 mora. ra.t.na.m "jewel" ya.jna.m "sacrifice" (acc.) pr.thi.vi.i "earth" sva.pa.tya.sya "handsome" vi.kra.a.n.ti.m "victorious stride" The critical distinction is between 1-mora syllables and syllables of more than one mora; all traditional Sanskrit poetic prosody depends upon this distinction between `light' and `heavy' syllables. Little attention is paid to the distinction between 2-mora and 3-mora syllables. LATIN Moraic features are similar to Sanskrit above. CLASSICAL GREEK ge.ra.i HLL "well" lova lo.o.va HLL "bed" diena di.e.na LLH "afternoon" rytas ri.i.ta.s HLLL "morning" ac^iu a.a.Cu.u HLLL "thank you" labas la.a.ba.s LHLL "good" lovys lo.o.vi.i.s LLLHL "tub" vakaras va.a.ka.ra.s LHLLLLL "evening" CLASSICAL ARABIC JAPANESE (Standard Japanese) SEN-EN se.N.e.N [see~ee~n] HLLL one thousand yen SENNEN se.N.ne.N [see~nee~n] HLLL one thousand years SEIEN se.e.e.N [se::e~n] LHHH cheering SEINEN se.e.ne.N [se:nee~n] LHHH adolescent SEQKEN se.Q.ke.N [se_kee~n] LHHH soap ([_] shows silence) TEQSEN te.Q.se.N [tes:ee~n] LHHH iron wire UMA u.ma [u-ma] LH horse (ordinary) UMA N.ma [mma] LH horse (colloq., fast speech) POKEQTO po.ke.Q.to [poke_to] LHLL pocket Traditionally sokuon /Q/ is regarded as consonantal gemination. This theory is true in sibilant gemination /s/ [s] and /sj/ [S]. TEQSEN te.Q.se.N [tes:ee~] LHHH iron wire HAQSIja ha.Q.sja [haS:a] LHHH (train or bus) starts But /Q/ is realized as silence before stops including affricates, /c/ [ts] and /cj/ [tS]. MEQTU me.Q.cu [me_tsu-] HLL Mets(?): juice name HAQTIjaKU ha.Q.cja.ku [ha_tSaku-] LHHH departure and arrival /Q/ is usually realized as silence or duration of sibilant noise. Phonetically it does not have a pitch information because its silence. Maybe the previous vowel have the pitch information and a hearer phono- gically recognizes that /Q/ has a high pitch. KAQTA ka.Q.ta [ka_ta] HLL won KAQTA ka.Q.ta [ka_ta] LHH bought I think high pitch of /Q/ is suspectible. Sokuon /Q/ is mainly devided into two phonetical realization: a) silence before voiceless consonants and affricates. b) voiceless sibilant before voiceless sibilant. KILIVILA (KIRIWINA) ba.la "I will go" e.la "he/she goes" a.m.be.sa "where" ba.ki.u.m "I will do secretly" bi.ka.tu.po.i.a.i.m.si "they will ask you" m.se.'u "smoke" ka.bi.ta.m "wisdom" m.m.mo.ta "this (bundle)" la.o.di.la "bush, jungle" i.si.si.a.si "they stay (in a place)" i.ka.tu.po.i.a.i.da.si "he asks us" to.m.mo.ta "people" Some East Oceanic Languages: HAWAIIAN, FIJIAN SIOUAN LANGUAGES (NORTH AMERICA): DAKOTAN, OMAHA-PONCA, WINNEBAGO(HOCHANK), CROW (4) QUESTIONABLE LANGUAGES AS A MORAIC FINNISH I and M. Hall Dunn agree Finnish is mora-timed. But T. Salminen, P. M. Bertinetto disagree. muta mu.ta HL mutta mu.t.ta HLL but muuta mu.u.ta HLL muutta mu.u.t.ta HLLL earth (abl.) CHINESE San Duan wrote: > In my opinion, Chinese is also mora-timed. See references. (5) REFERENCES Definitions Trubetzkoy, N.S. (1977) _Grundzuege der Phonologie_ Vandenhoeck & ruprecht, Goettingen Hayes, Bruce _Metrical Stress Theory_ Pike, Kenneth (1964) _Phonetics: A critical analysis of phonetic theory and a technic for the practical description of sounds_ The University of Michigan Ilse Lehiste Pier Marco Bertinetto (1989) _Reflections on the dichotmy <stress> vs. <syllable-timing>_ Revue de Phonetique Appliquee n. 91-92-93 Cutler, Anne (1983) _Prosody: Models and Measurements_ Springer Verlag Kilivila (Kiriwina) Senft, Gunter, (1952) _Kilivila : the language of the Trobriand Islanders_ Berlin ; New York : Mouton de Gruyter, c1986. Series title: Mouton grammar library ; 3. CHINESE Duanmu, San. (1994) _Syllabic weight and syllabic durations: A correlation between phonology and phonetics_ Phonology 11.1: 1-24. (6) SUMMARIZER'S COMMENTS I think it take long time and effort to study moraness. I have several qustions and suggestions to study it. 1) Viepoints: I found some arguments or theories got confused with different viewpoints auch as PHONETICAL, PHONOLOGICAL and MORPHOLOGICAL ones. 2) Provability: Is it possible to prove moraness by phonetical experiments? For example, isochrony. 3) Usefulness: Is it useful to categorize language by moraness? Is this concept meaningful for phonological analysis? 4) Syllable and Mora: How is the relationship between a syllable and a mora? Are they exclusive concepts or overlapping entities? 5) Definition: What are conditions (bases) to construct moraness? 6) Consensus: Why cannot so many scholars reach to consensus about moraness? Sincerely yours KAWAGASHIRA Nobuyuki s945025
ipe.tsukuba.ac.jp http://koryu3.statc.go.jp/~kawagasr/